On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:11 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
> No problem, I will meet you here in a couple of years and we can compare > notes. > Good, but I was hoping you'd be able to tell us now if you might get a little skeptical if the hot cat has a similar fate that the steam cat has seen in the last 2 years. If it has come to nothing in that time, will you be so confident? > I assure you that I can speak to any of the objections that you have provided they are not totally out of reality. That's your argument? You assure me that you have one? Mostly you ignore my objections and speak to someone else's and repeat your own unsupported claims. > Lets start with one of your choice regarding the many heat generation issues. How about how a small amount of heat can control a much larger amount? Are you interesting in an explanation or do you want to keep stating things that can be shown wrong? You haven't shown anything to be wrong. And if you have an explanation for controlling positive thermal feedback with heat, why don't you just give it already, instead of repeatedly saying you will give it. > Or, how about my favorite recent issue about how DC flowing due to rectification in the load Someone else's argument. Address my points when you respond to my posts, or it's very inefficient.
