More... Here is the entire paper
http://www.phys.vt.edu/~scarola/cooper.pdf Cooper Instability of Composite Fermions On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v406/n6798/abs/406863a0.html > > *Cooper instability of composite fermions* > > > This should answer your question about cooper pairing and how it happens. > > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:21 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > >> Bob, >> >> I am a bit confused about how the electron pair acts like a -2 charge in >> an atom according to your theory. Do you visualize the -2 charge pair >> orbiting a nucleus of hydrogen for example in this description? Or, are >> they moving together as a pair that does not require a positive charge to >> keep them together? >> >> It is good to see that you have been considering the pairing of electrons >> as a unit. That is the root of my question about whether or not electrons >> repel each other at all normal distances. Much depends upon how the spin >> generated magnetic field falls off with distance when compared with >> electric field fall off. >> >> The Dirac articles imply that the energy associated with the spin >> magnetic field is greater than that of the energy needed to free up the >> epos. I find this very interesting and also leads me to question the >> normal pair production concept. My tendency is to cling to the COE with >> all claws until no other explanation can be proven. >> >> If epos actually exist, they would be neutral and difficult to isolate. >> One might suggest that a large magnetic field might be able to pull them >> apart in a matter somewhat like we are considering for the activity of LENR >> systems. There seems to be so many possible avenues to explore as we >> attempt to explain how nuclear reactions can occur at low temperatures. >> Spin coupling via strong magnetic forces still offers the best solutions in >> my estimate. It will be ironic if it turns out that the high energy >> physics experiments totally miss this means of interaction due to the very >> fact that they operate at such elevated energy levels and low densities. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Wed, Apr 30, 2014 6:50 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance >> >> Dave-- >> >> Also it has been my concept that the pair act like a -2 charge in an >> atom. The dipole interaction distance is fairly short compared to the 1/r >> associated with a bare charge. I also like to think of the attraction as >> a spin coupling effect not unlike the spin orbit force discussed in the >> following item: The mechanism is not described very well in this item >> however. >> >> arXiv.org <http://arxiv.org/> > >> nucl-ex<http://arxiv.org/list/nucl-ex/recent>> arXiv:1401.1593v1 >> >> >> >> Bob >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 8:06 AM >> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance >> >> Dave asked: >> “The fact that a pair of electrons can work together even though they >> are repelled by the electric charge they possess leads me to wonder how >> they ever work as a pair.” >> Just one more of the inconsistencies in modern fizzix dogma… >> >> If the electron/hole is modeled as a dipole-like oscillation, then the >> answer to your question Is very simple… two electron-oscillations 180 >> degrees out of phase will ‘couple’, and the complementary ends together >> will cancel what we call ‘charge’, the pair is free to move w/o being >> influenced by other charged entities in the lattice. >> >> -Mark >> >> *From:* David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com <dlrober...@aol.com?>] >> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:57 AM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance >> >> We have been discussing spin coupling as one element that might allow >> LENR to proceed without dangerous radiation emissions. And, it is well >> known that super conductive materials use Cooper pairs of electrons to >> operate. >> >> The fact that a pair of electrons can work together even though they are >> repelled by the electric charge they possess leads me to wonder how they >> ever work as a pair. The force of repulsion between two like charges >> varies as the square of the distance separating them according to the E >> field distribution. The closer they approach each other, the stronger is >> the repulsion. But magnetic near field effects vary as the third order >> with distance for two pole sources. >> >> If the electrons find a way to allow the magnetic attraction to be >> positive by for example having opposite spin, then is there a certain >> distance where the two forces balance out? If so, one might expect the two >> to actually become attracted to each other when closer approach occurs. >> So, does spin of an electron lead to a magnetic field that can actually >> allow a pair to become attracted at very close ranges? >> >> If the attraction possibility exists would it be demonstrated in a beam >> of electrons traveling within a vacuum? The relative velocity and hence >> temperature variation along the beam can be reduced significantly by >> adjusting the source and control electrodes. >> >> Another question that immediately comes to the table is whether or not >> pairs of electrons are the natural manner in which they exist within >> metals, etc. Do techniques exist that can prove that they are individuals >> under normal conditions or do we just make that assumption? Perhaps >> slightly elevated temperatures break apart the weak connection that exists >> between pairs or relatively small electromagnetic fields tear them apart >> under test conditions. >> >> One observation that appears valid is that electrons certainly occur in >> pairs around nuclei. Could that be their normal state of existence? >> >> Dave >> >> >
