Earthquakes too.  Many earthquakes happen under strong jet streams.
Jet Streams too.  Many Supercells Spawn from Jet Streams.  Supercells
too....

Leg bone connected to knee bone, etc...

We live on a vacuum(6-d brane core of Earth), in a vacuum with a
little air and water vapor thrown on some baryonic crust  we call
home...

Just my take on it.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been trying to be less partisan, so I will simply say -- maybe. I don't
> deny that LENR happens in nature, I just don't think everything weird in
> nature happens because of BEC formation that has no precedent in any work
> done on BEC.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Any of them that does not produce gamma radiation is producing a BEC. For
>> example, a spark produces a cloud of nanoparticles in which a polariton
>> condensate is formed. In the instant when transmutation is occurring, a BEC
>> has formed.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> And absolutely all of them are manifestations of BEC?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LENR is ubiquitous and obvious. It is seen in lightning, volcanic
>>>> processes, electrical discharges (Ken Shoulders), exploding foils, and
>>>> cavitation to name just a few. DGT has a list in their ICCF-17 paper.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Leaving the idea of mathematical equivalence aside, and for the sake of
>>>>> argument I'll just take your word for it (though I'm sure that's a 
>>>>> debatable
>>>>> point), if they were physically equivalent LENR would not be such a novel 
>>>>> &
>>>>> hard-to-detect effect -- it would be ubiquitous and obvious. Or, at the 
>>>>> very
>>>>> least, not so rare at the classical level. For example, I think there is
>>>>> evidence that humans are quantum-coherent, but I have actual evidence from
>>>>> investigations of biological organisms to back that up, not abstractions
>>>>> from disparate fields of study that I make subjective connections between.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK so we can't test the quantum-coherent gamma barrier, right? We just
>>>>> take it on a certain amount of faith (for the present I'm guessing) that 
>>>>> it
>>>>> can do all the things you say it does? Similar to WLT? If this is the 
>>>>> case,
>>>>> at the very least I think some calculations for a phenomenon that produces
>>>>> no testable predictions in LENR systems. WLT do provide calculations at
>>>>> least, though most of them have been torn apart by a number of competent
>>>>> people in the field.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The physics and math of ultra cold BEC is the same as for polariton
>>>>>> BEC. I read that somewhere. So the experimental results of one can be
>>>>>> applied to the other. Experiments of hot BEC are not possible because the
>>>>>> parameters of the experiment cannot be well controlled. Cold BEC is 
>>>>>> always
>>>>>> used for experimentation because parameters can be controlled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my mind, polariton lasers show energy sharing where pumped energy
>>>>>> is converted to a single energy level.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was work on "ultracold atom ensembles". OK, that's interesting,
>>>>>>> and? Why are you so sure "ultracold" phenomenon can so easily manifest 
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> high temperature. And what proves these ultracold phenomenon can 
>>>>>>> generate
>>>>>>> some system-wide absorption of radiation & internal thermal heat? I'll 
>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>> again if there's anyway to experimentally demonstrate what you're 
>>>>>>> talking
>>>>>>> about in very different LENR systems?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Think of Rydberg excitement as the energy product of the reaction in
>>>>>>>> terms of the physics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You lost me there. It must be because, like Jones said, I don't
>>>>>>>>> understand QM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As far as I was aware, if we are talking about the same experiment,
>>>>>>>>> is that the IR hot-spots clearly demonstrate an NAE reacting. Nothing 
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> nothing less. They were not detecting nuclear products, just spotted 
>>>>>>>>> heat
>>>>>>>>> events. I don't understand how this demonstrates a BEC-shield in any 
>>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If superfuidic temperature distribution is demonstrated in a NjH
>>>>>>>>>> reactor, this proves that a global BEC has formed. The production of
>>>>>>>>>> flashing hot spots as viewed by a infrared camera shows that a BEC 
>>>>>>>>>> has not
>>>>>>>>>> formed. I has seen this video. If no hot spots are seen in the 
>>>>>>>>>> lattice of
>>>>>>>>>> the reactor, then a BEC has formed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, so these papers are basically saying hot fusion/fission is
>>>>>>>>>>> occurring in these nano-plasmon environments, right? Now the trick 
>>>>>>>>>>> of course
>>>>>>>>>>> is proving that a coherent BEC state, that links together a 
>>>>>>>>>>> phase-coherent
>>>>>>>>>>> quantum-system (aka "soliton") then dissipates all that mass energy 
>>>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>>>> systemic distribution, can actually exist. Widom-Larsen have taken 
>>>>>>>>>>> a similar
>>>>>>>>>>> road without success. Hagelstein has tried to do this through a 
>>>>>>>>>>> phonon
>>>>>>>>>>> quasi-particle model with limited success. Again, the papers are 
>>>>>>>>>>> all well
>>>>>>>>>>> and good, what experiments do you suggest to show this is going on 
>>>>>>>>>>> in all
>>>>>>>>>>> NiH LENR systems beside the particle chamber suggestion?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have put forth the nanoplasmonic experiments done with lasers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Repeated many times in previous posts and  except in part as
>>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  have referenced papers here to show how the confinement of
>>>>>>>>>>>> electrons on the surface of gold nanoparticles: a nanoplasmonic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanism
>>>>>>>>>>>> can change the half-life of U232 from 69 years to 6 microseconds. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> It also
>>>>>>>>>>>> causes thorium to fission.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  See references:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv-NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Experiments showing the same mechanism as listed below:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of
>>>>>>>>>>>> solid targets in heavy water"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0830
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au
>>>>>>>>>>>> nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium aqua ions
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to