We're going to put these in splice cases that would cost easily thousands of dollars to hydrovac-unfreeze and replace if a single splitter failed in -40 degree winter... now Fiberstore SFPs are great but tell me, in the above case would you put a $11 FS Splitter or a $60 huge-name-brand splitter?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 3:40 PM Mark - Myakka Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin, > > $60.00? > > FS.com 1x16 PLC bare fiber $11.00 > > > > *-- Best regards, Mark *mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]> > > > *Myakka Technologies, Inc. *www.MyakkaTech.com > > > > > > *------ Wednesday, August 29, 2018, 3:18:14 PM, you wrote: * > > ActiveEthernet: Property acquisition for the land, legal fees, concrete > pad, electrical install, cabinet, UPS, heating/cooling, fiber switch is > probably $10,000 - 15,000 including cost of time. When we're busy I'm not > sure that it would be worth doing for only 30 homes. > > PON: two 1x16 fiber splitters that fit in existing splice cases and > require none of that support cost $60 each. > > Shared bandwidth...16 customers sharing 2.5gbit fiber looks pretty good > when we still have tower sites with 16 customers on a 10mbit 2.4Ghz FSK AP. > And 10Gbit GPON seems to be coming soon... > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you have one strand going out there, you hang a switch and give all 30 > homes active E. > > Each home needs a drop. > So you have to connect the drop to either a splitter or an SFP. > > With AE you will have to power the switch but then you have no shared > bandwidth, it has market cache vs shared bandwidth old fashioned GPON etc... > > > > *From:* Colin Stanners > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 12:57 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Ufiber > > That's the main reason, and it branches into upgradeability. If a new > 30-house subdivision appears in a field a few miles from your headend, and > you have a spare 10 strands going out there, you only need to use 2-3 > strands instead of running new 48-strand cable the whole way. > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, other than the obvious strand count advantages, why would you use this > vs active ethernet? > > *From:* Jim Bouse [Brazos WiFi] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 12:04 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Ufiber > > It works fine. We have it in 2 subdivisions. > It is brain dead simple to configure. > Since it “Just Works” there isn’t a lot to configure. The ONU (cpe) can > run in bridge or router mode. I’m not sure what the routing/NAT speeds are > capable of but it will do 1G in bridge mode without breaking a sweat. > > Jim Bouse > Owner - Brazos WiFi > 979-985-5912 > http://www.brazoswifi.com > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 12:17 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Ufiber > > Does anyone actually have this equipment in a production environment? I > have a test setup, just haven't heard much discussion about it so I thought > I'd check with the group. > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
