Nothing wrong with splitters. You will have to do some extra design work with the splitters. Also, there is the waste factor. We design to the property not the customer, so it is very rare we get a full 32 customers on a 1x32 splitter.
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:m...@mailmt.com
Myakka Technologies, Inc.
www.MyakkaTech.com
------
Wednesday, August 29, 2018, 3:24:23 PM, you wrote:
I can generally get a building permit to use a public utility ROW or the side of a street for almost free. Perhaps use a customers home for everything in exchange for service etc. I agree, for 30 PON is a good way to go. But I like the simplicity of AE, the fact that I can cast shade on PON based competitors and not having to deal with splitters. And I do PON all day long with Calix. But for a non regulated for profit startup, Calix is not the way to go. However I do not trust UBNT in this space... yet... From: Colin Stanners Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:18 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti Ufiber ActiveEthernet: Property acquisition for the land, legal fees, concrete pad, electrical install, cabinet, UPS, heating/cooling, fiber switch is probably $10,000 - 15,000 including cost of time. When we're busy I'm not sure that it would be worth doing for only 30 homes. PON: two 1x16 fiber splitters that fit in existing splice cases and require none of that support cost $60 each. Shared bandwidth...16 customers sharing 2.5gbit fiber looks pretty good when we still have tower sites with 16 customers on a 10mbit 2.4Ghz FSK AP. And 10Gbit GPON seems to be coming soon... On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com |
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com