I had thought I identified which probes werent working, but its not limited
to single OIDs, its across the board and random, thus far they haven been
able to provide any functional probe report.

One of the probe issues we found is that editing a device and changing its
type, thus changing its probes, leaves the internal probe index name the
same as the old probe (caused a major issue when we had a bunch of alvarion
alerts when we dont have it anymore). worse yet is alot of the probes did
work, but now dont. TBH, powercode should just do like theyre doing with
bandwidth management/accounting and hand it off to a third party. basically
make powercode an API skeleton/aggregator into systems that actually
function reliably and make the core of powercode a glorified quickbooks
instance/schedule management system
I think the database is corrupt, but they apparently have no integrity
checks. Im to the point that ive asked them about wiping the entirety of
the probes and the rrd data as they have had to do twice in the past. this
is a major pain, losing all that historic data, but considering without
checking every single device, we dont know whats even probing and what is
not and its random. Not to mention it would be nice to know the probe
alerts will present with the actual probe names again.
Way back in the day when the probing would fail over a bad OID there was a
log i could check, but apparently thats not how it logs now. Powercode has
always had an abysmally fragile probe system.
If anybody can point me to logs, id be more than grateful.

The API authentication was just the last thing with their mikrotik
integration. They have garbage documentation, their support refuses to
provide instruction sets, points you to outside consultants, which i find
it odd that a consultant would have access to powercode documentation that
neither powercode, nor powercodes paying customers have access to, maybe
its some contract, though linktechs is unaware of it, maybe theres a secret
handshake i need to know.  I find it absolutely ignorant that every time i
update an ip range, powercode will delete the gateway from the mikrotik and
ill have to go add it again. I literally can think of zero valid reason for
it to do that. For whatever reason DHCP doesnt work, installed on the
mikrotik, or using the powercode interface to set up a relay, yet when i
configure a straight relay it works just fine. I have no major issue witht
hat as id rather manage the relay myself so powercode doesnt randomly
delete that too.
I dont like that it set up a queue on the test router for my bosses
personal account though i had exactly zero equipment added to the BMU and
at the time, no ip ranges defined.

Powercode has always ebbed and flowed, but right now its deplorable, being
forced back to the third party router BMU is fine, i liked the imagestreams
they made us deploy, then forced us to buy their BMUs. But at least in the
imagestream days they actually supported their requirements. Theres the
sesai or whatever flavor third party junk theyre pimping this week, just
like all the others they pimped then dropped, so im not all that interested
in going that route. Im still holding a grudge that on the morning of my
wedding I woke to powercode randomly deciding to have massive phantom usage
spikes (again) . Id recomend to the bosses migrating to another system, but
the grass is never greener, if we move away, wed be better served to pay
somebody to build us a proper solution, it would be cheaper than sasai or
whetever is the flavor of the month with powercode. Or go to any of the
free open source solutions out there since we are being forced to spin up
all kinds of other servers anyway to mitigate their shortcomings. Powercode
is still better than a bunch of spreadsheets though.

that turned into more of a rant than anticipated, seeing my credentials in
plain text just set me off, glad we arent hosted

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 5:15 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> Your complaint seems to be probes and the Mikrotik API authentication.  If
> you have broken probes, it's your setup as they're working for me and many
> others.  What exactly isn't working?  What OIDs?  The only caveat I'd say
> is that if one OID is broken in the query, they start responding poorly -
> it's done this way for scaling and irrelevant if you've got it set up right.
>
> Not sure about the API auth but I do agree it should be secured.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:35 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Powercode has become quite a joke. Half our probes havent worked for
>> months and they dont even respond to the ticket. We had to spin up Librenms
>> just to get monitoring data
>>
>> Trying to integrate mikrotik BMUs and having issues, they have zero
>> legitimate documentation and when you ask whats supposed to be
>> happening they tell you to seek out a consultant and that the info may be
>> proprietary.
>>
>> Thats all bad enough, but i figure ill do some packet sniffing to find
>> out what the communication is between the billing server and the mikrotik,
>> maybe find out I misconfigured something, come to find out the nitwits are
>> sending out the authentication in PLAIN TEXT. They dont even have a
>> disclaimer when you add one of these. but christ, if youre operating an off
>> network BMU, your infrastructure credentials are getting tossed into the
>> ether like its nothing.
>>
>> I wish simon hadnt left
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to