IBEC was at least partially gov'mt funded.  Thanks gov'mt.  Much appreciated.  
It's my understanding they were not performing adequately and there were issues 
at the time the tornado came through. I've heard varying stories but the most 
recent is that the insurance company balked on paying the claim and the gov'mt 
saw that and refused to release any additional funds.  They were so reliant on 
the gov'mt they could not sustain operations nor would the gov'mt give them any 
flexibility while "waiting on" the insurance company.   To my knowledge IBEC 
didn't try to secure funding from banks or anything along those lines (if they 
had ongoing operational costs I can see where waiting on a bank to approve 
financing might have been a problem )  - - - - (although i am aware of SEVERAL 
projects funded by local banks after the tornado came through that may not have 
been done without a disaster....the banks around here really stood up)

THAT BEING SAID....yes, it was a very quick shut down.  I think, in a way, it 
was a flawed rollout anyway.  The technology might have been sound - but the 
design was poorly done.  Its my understanding the way we'll operate a "node" is 
order a t-1 from the phone company and see if we can put 150 subscribers on it. 
 hahaha.  funny stuff.  There were musings of fiber being installed (but could 
take 6-9 months to install) prior to the tornado coming through.

Now had they worked with us (or had we worked with them...and we discussed it 
internally more than once....but did we really want to help our competition?) 
.... and had we done some wireless backhaul for them....maybe it wouldn't have 
been such a horrible service.

Was netflix even popular in 2011?  I don't think so...


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ken Hohhof 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 1:52 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] reasonable request


  Why would you give him a break?  He didn’t help you build your network with 
revenue all these years, like your longtime loyal customers who paid full 
price.  Instead, he went with the BPL guys, who didn’t charge enough to be 
financially healthy, and who closed down due to the “financial damage” of the 
storm.  Probably loss of customers more than loss of infrastructure.  Probably 
the storm gave them an excuse to shut down a money losing operation.

  This sounds like the pig who built the straw house, wanting a new brick house 
at a straw house price, plus wanting someone else to pay for his unwise choice 
and build him the house for free.  How is the fact that he paid $100 to this 
other company for an install relevant?  I’m assuming nothing about a BPL 
install can be reused for a WISP install, in fact it sounds like what he paid 
for was not so much an install as a BPL modem.  If we save money by reusing 
part of another WISP’s install (like the mount or cable), we do discount the 
install.

  He should be happy he got $30 IBEC broadband for as long as it lasted, they 
evidently weren’t charging enough, but he saved some money.

  And how is Jay’s company taking advantage?  I assume he didn’t jack up his 
prices after IBEC folded.  Other customers paid those prices all along and 
helped fund the infrastructure.  Now the straw house pig wants to get a 
discount on the brick house other pigs helped pay for?  How would that be fair?



  From: That One Guy /sarcasm 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 1:35 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] reasonable request

  I would like a follow up on this individual. did you cut him a break, and if 
so how soon after that did he give you a rectal probe of some sort?

  On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    This is a communication we received from someone shortly after IBEC folded.

    "Seems to me that you guys are kind of trying to take a little advantage of 
the unfortunate plight of the IBEC customers. We got charged $100.00 by IBEC 
for a modem to get set up for their service and then paid a fairly reasonable 
monthly fee of 29.95. For this investment we only got just a little over a 
year's worth of service before we received word that they are ending their 
service due to their inability to overcome the tornado damage from April 27 
2011. Now you guys seem to be trying to capitalize on the present circumstances 
that IBEC customers find themselves in by charging double the setup charge and 
double the monthly fee. It's either you guys or back to dialup service for us 
IBECS at this point. It would just be nice given the status of the current 
economic situation for someone to have a little sympathy on those of us who are 
already struggling to make ends meet. I believe I read where WISP banded 
together to help you guys out and get up and running again after the Tornado 
back in April, so it would be nice to see you all do unto others as you would 
have others do unto you. I know you all are a business and have to make enough 
money to stay afloat, but it would be nice to feel like there was a company out 
there willing to give the little guy a break every now and then. Hopefully you 
guys will reconsider the situation and decide to give us a better deal than is 
currently being offered, because at this point frankly a lot of us IBEC 
customers are gun shy due to the rug being pulled out from under us. I mean 
what's to prevent you guys from doing the same thing to us a few months down 
the road after we put out the money to get set up with your service? Signed, 
frustrated in Crane Hill. "

    Brett A Mansfield wrote:

      My area is a lot of people that seem to be entitled about everything. 
They are cheapskates of all cheapskates. If they can get away with paying less 
they will. And the few customers I have that did pay a $50 install fee back 
when I charged it are the ones I have the hardest time getting to pay their 
bills. It is certainly different in every market. The vast majority of my 
customers are brand new families that are just starting out.

      Thank you,
      Brett A Mansfield

      On Oct 6, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


        We overlap with Rise.  They do free install + first month free.  When I 
fire a customer for egregious nonpayment problems, I often see a Rise dish 
appear on their house.  And then disappear a few months later.
        One former customer is on their 5th WISP dish on their house.  Rise has 
installed and de-installed twice.
        If your area is very upscale, maybe what Mark says isn�t true.  I am 
not so lucky, and my experience is similar to Mark�s.  We will break the 
install fee into 2 payments if the customer makes a credible case they can�t 
pay it all at once, like retirees on fixed income.
        *From:* Mark Radabaugh <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2015 11:28 AM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] reasonable request
        We have tried both free install, $25 install and $75 install.   There 
is a significant correlation between the number of short term (<90 day) non-pay 
disconnects and the free or $25 install.    Keeping the install high enough 
that the customer has at least some skin in the game makes a measurable 
difference.
        Mark

          On Oct 6, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Ty Featherling <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
          I wasn't speaking globally. In our area the only company that is 
offering free installs is the one that can't seem to keep customers.
          -Ty
          On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Brett A Mansfield 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

              Companies that are hurting for customers are not the only ones
              that do free installation. I am not hurting for customers at all
              (I'd actually like to offload a few) and I do free installation.
              Anyone that has a quality product at the right price for
              customer and the ISP can afford to do a free installation
              because that customer will be very loyal and stay with you for a
              long time.

              Thank you,
              Brett A Mansfield

              On Oct 6, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Ty Featherling
              <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


                I  basically told him just that. I told him the only providers
                giving away installations are those that are hurting for
                customers. I gave him all to positives about our company and
                service and told him I hope he finds what he is looking for
                from another provider.
                -Ty
                On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    You can�t always get what you want.
                    But if you try sometimes you just might find
                    You get what you need.
                    I would take the position that your service is the best
                    available in your area, and it costs what it costs, no
                    promos or freebies. If it�s the best, people pay your price
                    on your terms to get it.
                    You know all those 50 year old guys you see driving new
                    Corvettes?  Most of them have wanted one since they were 20
                    and kept asking the dealer when they were having a sale. So
                    they drove Malibus for 30 years, until they paid the asking
                    price for the Corvette.
                    Do these guys walk up to supermodels and say �Hey, babe,
                    if you�re ever giving it away, call me�? Does that ever
                    work?  And if it did work, would that change the
                    desirability factor?
                    I�ve had people like this ask once a year if we were having
                    a promo or free installs yet and finally after 2-3 years
                    order service.  The fact that you don�t give it away
                    enhances your brand image as the best.
                    Or they just continue on their quest for fast, good and
                    cheap with a guarantee but no strings and no upfront cost.  
       And a pony.
                    *From:* Ty Featherling <mailto:[email protected]>
                    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2015 8:43 AM
                    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                    *Subject:* [AFMUG] reasonable request
                    Check this out, via our website contact us form:
                    "Message:

                    I would like to use your service but I'm tired of endless
                    promises from vendors regarding reliability and available.
                    Up to xmps is a hollow promise.

                    I would like to use your service but I'm not willing to pay
                    an installation charge or sign a "contract", and want 24x7
                    availability and reliability.

                    What can you "garrantee" that will satisfy my requirements?

                    Thanks"

                    I replied with my best explanation of how internet service
                    works in the real world. I let him know we could possible
                    get him a dedicated connection and included an estimated
                    cost so that he could see the difference. His reponse was
                    to ask what our plans are to support UHD
                    (Ultra-High-Definition) streaming video. He thinks it is
                    ridiculous that he can only get HD streams to work.

                    I think I got through to him but damn, what the hell makes
                    a person think they can demand more while saying they
                    shouldn't have to pay installation or have a contract. He
                    finally left me with "let me know if you ever have a
                    promotion for free install and no contract."









  -- 

  If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to