There are dozens, maybe hundreds or thousands of advancements in medicine that have moved the average life expectancy from ~~ 40 years 200 years ago to ~~76 years today.

The difference is many different advances in medicine, which all cost money.

So. If you have money, you can expect to live ~~ 76 years.

If you don't have money, maybe it's closer to 40 years.

Is that fair?

Your answer to that question probably depends on how much money you have.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 12/18/2015 8:55 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:

The discovery of penicillin literally changed life for all of humanity. Imagine if Shkreli had invented it. Divorcing ethics from capitalism is a fool’s fairytale. Anyone who justifies it has never read about the history of the legal invention of “corporation.”

-Patrick

*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Friday, December 18, 2015 11:40 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Captilism (was Martin Shkreli)

You mean to tell me 200 years ago there wasn't any medicine? Sure it's far superior now, but in the 1800s they had basics.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I have to disagree. 200 years ago there were practically no
    medicines worth talking about yet here we all are. Medicine, while
    a fantastic advancement, does not rise to the level of air, water,
    food, and shelter.

    On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:17 AM Josh Luthman
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:

        Food, water, shelter, medicine.  The things anyone and
        everyone need to survive.


        Josh Luthman
        Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
        Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
        1100 Wayne St
        Suite 1337
        Troy, OH 45373

        On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Cameron Crum
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Since when has it been a basic human right? Where does it
            stop? Why are others forced to pay for peoples bad habits?
            Other than congenital defects, and some accidents, most
            health problems are due to peoples choices. If our money
            is to be confiscated to pay for everyone's "human right",
            don't we get a say in how they live? How many other human
            rights are being trampled on then?

            On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Should medicine really be part of a system of supply
                and demand? I'd agree on the whole hotel thing - you
                don't have to stay there - but when you have some
                medical condition (and while yes AIDS is something you
                can certainly avoid) I think as a society and a
                culture we shouldn't deny a basic human right.


                Josh Luthman
                Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
                Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
                1100 Wayne St
                Suite 1337
                Troy, OH 45373

                On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Lewis Bergman
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    I can't defend his brashness, but the fact remains
                    that pure capitalism is the best way demonstrated
                    to date to innovate and health care or pharma is
                    not exempt. Big rewards encourage big effort
                    yielding big results. These pharma companies have
                    something like 7 years until the exclusivity
                    period expires. That can be a pretty short time to
                    recover investments. This particular case may be a
                    bit extreme but to say that capitalism is broken
                    in America is simply ludicrous.

                    I recently attended my sons graduation from Texas
                    Tech on a Friday. Thursday night at the hotel was
                    $159 and Friday was $269. I don't think that is
                    price gouging. I think it is a reflection of the
                    simple fact that there are fewer rooms available
                    on that particular night than are demanded at
                    $159. The equilibrium was found at $259 where
                    supply and demand come closer to being equal. At
                    that price I still witnessed people turned away
                    wanting a room due to their poor planning. I don't
                    think that is price gouging. Their hotel was full
                    at $269 a night. The next day was $159 again.
                    Since the hotel was full they probably could have
                    been even higher.

                    I really don't understand what people have such a
                    huge issue with the fundamental theory of supply
                    and demand. Yes I understand that it is a
                    potentially life saving drug. There are other
                    cheaper treatments. Maybe they aren't as good,
                    which is why they are cheaper. When did we stop
                    rewarding people for the value they provide? I
                    know this jerk didn't invent it but he obviously
                    was willing to reward those who did with a price
                    they thought fair. Sales over the next few years
                    will prove if he made a mistake.

                    Why not force Chuck to sell a unique mount he made
                    for 5% over cost? Heck, why not only cover his
                    cost? Why not less than cost and force him to
                    provide his great product for the good of the
                    people? There is a reason it is named Animal Farm.
                    How many have read this book? While not about
                    capitalism it does speak to the kind of central
                    control that skulks below the overt argument for
                    "controlling" this type of behavior.

                    I know people might die. I'll put on my really
                    jerky hat and say "so what?". People die every day
                    for less meaning and in greater numbers. There is
                    practically a mass suicide movement going on now
                    with texting and driving. I don't see where people
                    value there lives or others that much anyway when
                    reading a text or email is more important than
                    life itself.

                    I guess I am just a big libertarian at heart. Give
                    me the loose framework of a "fair market",
                    whatever that is, and let the system fight it out.
                    The word isn't fair, not ever going to be fair,
                    stop trying to warp it to be that way.

                    Have fun with that on a Friday and have a Merry
                    Christmas, Happy Hanuka, or whatever else gets
                    your boat floating.

                    On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:02 AM Patrick Leary
                    <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        The irony? Your local poor schlub a-hole can
                        be arrested and charged if he doubles the
                        price of gas, water, or other life-critical
                        goods after a natural disaster – that’s a
                        crime in America. Meanwhile, it’s completely
                        legal for a company to raise a life-critical
                        drug by over 5000% -- that’s capitalism in
                        America.

                        Shkreli is only the most written about
                        example. This “business trend’ is all the rage
                        and has been widely employed in the U.S. for a
                        number of years now.
                        
http://news.health.com/2015/09/25/6-insane-examples-of-prescription-drug-price-increases/

                        Patrick

                        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of
                        *Ken Hohhof
                        *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2015 8:28 PM
                        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT - Martin Shkreli

                        Apparently this guy AND HIS LAWYER were
                        arrested today. Everybody knows him as the guy
                        who raises drug prices 5000%, but I did not
                        know he live streams almost daily to his fans.

                        Watch the first video, isn't he just like
                        every annoying, entitled, slacker kid living
                        in his parents basement that we have to deal
                        with bitching about his Internet? Except he is
                        CEO of a drug company.

                        I didn't think it was possible to hate him
                        more, but watch the video.

                        https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8gjB1PSXv_oAUSAQ16S0fA





                        
************************************************************************************
                        This footnote confirms that this email message
                        has been scanned by
                        PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of
                        malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
                        
************************************************************************************





                        
************************************************************************************
                        This footnote confirms that this email message
                        has been scanned by
                        PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of
                        malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
                        
************************************************************************************




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************





************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************


Reply via email to