Hey Lewis....we did use a bunch of Huber Suhner cable assemblies and antennas when we created the MPAA 900....4 90 degree panels with combiner back in NCR WaveLAN days...we sold about 150 to a Columbian integrator for a bank project.. wish I could find pictures of it. Anyways that was really nice cable. Pricey but was worth it for some hush hush projects using Cylink products. On Feb 10, 2016 8:02 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ehh I don't know about that... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Feb 10, 2016 9:50 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But it probably costs Verizon $25... >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 2/10/2016 6:43 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> It's $250 new :P >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Feb 10, 2016 8:05 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Are we still talking about a GPS cable for a $100 femtocell??!? >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 2/10/2016 4:16 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: >>> >>> Dude, don't do that. LMR600. We buy it by the thousands of feet. It is >>> much easier to run, less prone to damage, and equivalent in loss per >>> frequency range. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 4:09 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Andrew 1/2 Heliax >>>> On Feb 10, 2016 2:33 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's most helpful! Do you have any idea what kind of cable that >>>>> was? I'm assuming anything that will handle 1600 MHz with minimal loss >>>>> will work? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Sam Kirsch <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, I spoke to my field guy, he said they took an SMB <-> N >>>>>> Connector and ran LMR to the roof. Hope that helps. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network Support Plexicomm - Internet Solutions | >>>>>> www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net> <http://www.plexicomm.net>* >>>>>> * Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax: >>>>>> 1.866.852.4688 <1.866.852.4688>* >>>>>> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <1.866.759.9713> | >>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>> <[email protected]>* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>> From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:42:37 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's an SMB connector, but again I find it really had to believe that >>>>>> if you stick it outside until you get a good sync and power it down that >>>>>> it >>>>>> won't resync indoors, I've never tried inside of a nuclear bunker, but in >>>>>> normal houses and offices with tile and metal roofs I've never had one >>>>>> issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah. Something like that. All I recall is it was ~~ 1/4" or so in >>>>>>> diameter. Don't quote me on that. I am disavowing all knowledge. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bp >>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 6:37 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MCM as in MMC? Like MMCX? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2016 9:34 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Verizon cell extender (made by Samsung) has a little connector >>>>>>>> (don't recall the type, but it's about the size of MCM or so). Put a >>>>>>>> wire >>>>>>>> on the end of the coax, and you're there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 10:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How did you get a GPS antenna from the roof to the SCS box? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, samuel <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Verizon's Samsung SCS series 3G and 4G Network Extender is what I >>>>>>>>> was dealing with. We had to run our own GPS antenna from the roof >>>>>>>>> down to >>>>>>>>> the basement to get the damn thing to sync properly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As an aside, I didn't realize the Low E windows were code now, and >>>>>>>>> this is a very newly renovated building. Will keep that in mind! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- Sam Kirsch, Network Tech Support >>>>>>>>> Plexicomm Internet Solutions >>>>>>>>> Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax: >>>>>>>>> 1.866.852.4688 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] | Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> Date: 02/09/16 10:39 AM >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cell booster or gps booster? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>>>>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>>>>>>> 915-861-1390 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Sam Kirsch <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Pull out a GPS App on your phone and make sure you can actually >>>>>>>>>> read the satellites from behind the window (I used 'GPS Test' on >>>>>>>>>> Android). >>>>>>>>>> We had to install one of these boosters and were troubleshooting why >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> damn thing wasn't working when I noticed that my phone GPS receiver >>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> working in rooms where the windows were open and not working in >>>>>>>>>> rooms where >>>>>>>>>> the windows were closed. Building management didn't even know they'd >>>>>>>>>> purchased the windows with RF film. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network Support Plexicomm - Internet Solutions >>>>>>>>>> | www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net> >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.plexicomm.net>* >>>>>>>>>> * Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688* >>>>>>>>>> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 | >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>>>>>> From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:50:42 AM >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It might not be just a matter of getting the location. If they >>>>>>>>>> use the 1pps clock from GPS to calibrate an oscillator before they >>>>>>>>>> start >>>>>>>>>> transmitting, then it would legitimately take 20-30 minutes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Telrad BTS's are like that too. Pisses me off if I ever have to >>>>>>>>>> reset the power. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 12:12 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For whatever reason, the receivers that they use in some of these >>>>>>>>>> don't seem to be "modern" at all. They frequently take an >>>>>>>>>> excessively long >>>>>>>>>> time to get a lock. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very >>>>>>>>>>> accurately, from inside a single floor wood framed house... My >>>>>>>>>>> oneplus one >>>>>>>>>>> will pick up 6 satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ >>>>>>>>>>> from any >>>>>>>>>>> window. Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building >>>>>>>>>>> or something like that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> to tiny channel size and very basic modulation. >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" < >>>>>>>>>>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also >>>>>>>>>>>> fail if the GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile >>>>>>>>>>>> of where >>>>>>>>>>>> the customer address is. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the >>>>>>>>>>>> user guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that >>>>>>>>>>>> prevents a >>>>>>>>>>>> VPN? >>>>>>>>>>>> � >>>>>>>>>>>> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A >>>>>>>>>>>> address.� WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class >>>>>>>>>>>> A address?� Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind >>>>>>>>>>>> Cisco ASA >>>>>>>>>>>> firewall (which I don't manage). >>>>>>>>>>>> � >>>>>>>>>>>> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means >>>>>>>>>>>> something is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>
