That is what I read as well. Same as when the "touchscreen fingerprint id" started failing if it was not apple genuine.... and i don't even have an iphone....or an apple anything, really
----- Original Message ----- From: Joe Falaschi To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 5:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Apple I haven't been paying close attention to this but I thought I saw one TV report that said earlier versions of iOS could simply be unlocked. Supposedly Apple has unlocked previous unencrypted phones. That all changed with iOS 9 though because of encryption and that there is no simple unlock anymore. That's how I understood it anyway. Am I missing something? Joe On Feb 19, 2016, at 4:59 PM, Nate Burke wrote: But they're not actually asking for a back door, are they?� They're just saying 'hey, we have this physical device, can we give it to you, and you get us the data off of it'?� I've got to think that the Engineers at apple have a way to do this thought up.� Although at the same time, If they're trying to unlock the phone, couldn't the Gov't with it's vast resources, just simply make a bit by bit copy of the flash chip in the phone and just go through and try every unlock code? On 2/19/2016 4:54 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: Yup. Google agrees as well. On Feb 19, 2016 4:52 PM, "Sam Lambie" <[email protected]> wrote: Screw the govt. Apple is doing entirely doing the right thing. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: My Boss and I just had a discussion about this, he think that Cook should be in Jail for failing to comply with the order.� On 2/19/2016 4:46 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: ... What? Seriously? On Feb 19, 2016 4:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Treason? -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com
