It's not 100% clear from your description, but the AF11x is using both polarities.

The Mimosa is a very strange duck. Even using 2 channels and 2 polarities, there is no way to actually run it full duplex. The high-latency half duplex is pretty much baked in. IMO, it squanders air bandwidth at the expense of cheapness. And it's highest modulation rate is still only 256QAM. We had serious trouble trying to even get 256QAM on a relatively modest distance link.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 10/24/2016 4:28 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
I will take a crack at it... just to make sure that My understanding is correct too.

In licensed radio world, the default lingo is as follows:-
A single channel is actually two channels, one channel is used to Transmit and the other channel is used to receive. and each of these channels pair can be either in V polarity or H polarity (but not mingled). XPIC is used to describe a radio where you can mount two radios together, one using the H polarity and the other using V polarity, but the same channel... But still only one channel (H + V) is used to transmit and the other channel is used to Receive. (Thus Full duplex)

MIMO...., = One Channel, both H & V polarities are used, and either one can be used for Tx and Rx (thus half duplex)

AF11x = Traditional Licensed radio... one channel/polarity for TX and one channel/polarity for RX
Mimosa B11 =  Disruptive... a very odd animal... can be configured as...
Use one channel (both polarities) for TX and one channel (both polarities) for RX or ... Use Two Channels, both polarities in each channel, and use either one to TX & RX (more like a dual channel MIMO) AF5 = Uses one channel (both polarities) for Tx and one channel (both polarities) for RX

AF24 =   can be used as
One Channel (Dual Polarities) for TX and one Channel (Dual Polarities) for RX or can use the same one channel (dual polarities) for Tx and Rx.

Hope this is as clear as mud !

:)


Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From: *"George Skorup" <[email protected]>
    *To: *[email protected]
    *Sent: *Monday, October 24, 2016 7:09:11 PM
    *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

    What's so much different between XPIC and MIMO? I'm asking because
    I guess I'm just ignorant. MIMO = single carrier (is OFDM
    implied?), dual streams? And XPIC = dual carriers (is
    single-carrier QAM per channel implied?) and independent streams
    that are aggregated in hardware, perhaps as simple as a LAG on the
    internal switch? Or does XPIC add some more magic?

    So then what is the UBNT AF11X considered? Or the AF5 and 24 for
    that matter since they're also capable of FDD.

    On 10/24/2016 5:23 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

        Can a non-vendor tell me if at higher order modulations if
        there's limiting gain from co-channel XPIC? I assume it works
        to some degree because it's marketed (yes, I have a tub of
        salt over here), but at some point the modulations would be
        sensitive enough where the X-pol isolation isn't sufficient?

        Okay, a vendor can if they're more technical than salesy.

        I'm not meaning to imply John was salesy.

        ;-)



        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
        
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
        Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
        
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
        The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
        <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>


        <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From: *"John Seaman" <[email protected]>
        *To: *[email protected]
        *Sent: *Monday, October 24, 2016 3:55:17 PM
        *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

        Hi Ken, the Lynx and Orion are largely identical.  The biggest
        difference between the two is that the Orion supports XPIC
        where as the Lynx does not.   Keep in mind that either model
        can be set up for 2+0, but only with the Orion can both radios
        operate on the same channel.  Other than that, the Orion does
        offer higher TX power (for certain frequencies) compared to
        the Lynx.  However with 6 GHz, the TX frequency for Lynx and
        Orion are the same.  Orion also features SynchE/1588
        functionality which is not found on the Lynx.  Both models now
        support buffer size up to 8 MB.

        John Seaman |Sales|*Trango Systems, Inc. |*
        *+1-858-248-4006 <tel:+1-858-248-4006> *
        **|
        www.trangosys.com <http://trangosys.com/>
        ///Trango Systems <http://www.trangosys.com/>///
        //////
        /Innovating Microwave Backhaul//™/



        On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Jeremy, I’m trying to remember, can you upgrade that Lynx
to 2+0 with a license key as long as you don’t need XPIC? Trango doesn’t spell it out very well on their website,
            but it looks like the major differences between Lynx and
            Orion are buffer size, XPIC, and maybe the interface and
            powering options?  So that you could still double the
            throughput as long as you can license a different
            frequency pair for the other polarization.  And the issue
            of the wired interface speed.

            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy
            *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 10:16 PM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

            I don't know who has the biggest or best, but my 6GHz
            Trango Apex Lynx has been rock solid for going on four
            years now.  It does 700Mbps FDX.  I believe that the
            Trango Orion has XPIC up to 1.5Gbps in a 56Mhz channel.

            On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Josh Reynolds
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Why in the world would they buy Exalt?

                On Oct 21, 2016 8:10 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    I thought Crisco bought out Exalt

                    On Oct 21, 2016 5:10 PM, "Ken Hohhof"
                    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        I thought I got an ad recently from Exalt
                        about a big sale through the end of the year
                        on Extreme Air 6Hz.  Oops, I just found the
                        email, and it’s everything but 6 GHz.  Not
                        sure I’d buy Exalt anyway. Maybe someone else
                        was having an overstock sale on 6 GHz?

                        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of
                        *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 5:50 PM
                        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz
                        system

                        First I have to find out if there are channels
                        in this area.

                        Then I have a passive repeater to deal with...

                        Not a simple path to engineer.

                        *From:*Daniel White

                        *Sent:*Friday, October 21, 2016 4:33 PM

                        *To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                        *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz
                        system

                        Well you can only use 60MHz channels max. That
                        helps make it more competitive.

                        6GHz most likely precludes higher modulations…
                        you just won’t have the link budget.  Also
                        depends if you’re going all outdoor or
                        split-mount/all-indoor.

                        I’d be shocked if there is a winner here – I’d
                        go with the solution your most comfortable with.

                        My guess is you will end up with
                        Ceragon/Cambium or SIAE. DragonWave Harmony
                        Advanced is certainly worth a look, although
                        I’m not sure about 6GHz availability since it
                        just started shipping.

                        Chuck feel free to contact me offlist and we
                        could look at some things.

                        Daniel White

                        Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

                        ConVergence Technologies

                        Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
                        <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

                        [email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>

                        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On
                        Behalf Of *[email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 2:04 PM
                        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Subject:* [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

                        Who has the highest capacity 6 GHz systems
                        these days?

                        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

                                

                        Virus-free. www.avast.com
                        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>







Reply via email to