Plus a diplexer. Unlike "most" licensed radios (Exalt being the notable exception), the radios do not have to be bought as "lo" or "high". The AF11x and all the Exalt radios I know of have a reversible diplexer. So you can stock one spare that can work at both ends.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 10/24/2016 5:51 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

AF11X actually has two internal radios if my understanding of the platform is correct. It is Full Duplex + MIMO.


On Oct 24, 2016 7:03 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    It's not 100% clear from your description, but the AF11x is using
    both polarities.

    The Mimosa is a very strange duck. Even using 2 channels and 2
    polarities, there is no way to actually run it full duplex. The
    high-latency half duplex is pretty much baked in. IMO, it
    squanders air bandwidth at the expense of cheapness. And it's
    highest modulation rate is still only 256QAM. We had serious
    trouble trying to even get 256QAM on a relatively modest distance
    link.


    bp
    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

    On 10/24/2016 4:28 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
    I will take a crack at it... just to make sure that My
    understanding is correct too.

    In licensed radio world, the default lingo is as follows:-
       A single channel  is actually two channels, one channel is
    used to Transmit and the other channel is used to receive.
       and each of these channels pair can be either in V polarity or
    H polarity (but not mingled).
    XPIC is used to describe a radio where you can mount two radios
    together, one using the H polarity and the other using V
    polarity, but the same channel...
    But still only one channel (H + V) is used to transmit and the
    other channel is used to Receive. (Thus Full duplex)

    MIMO...., = One Channel, both H & V polarities are used,  and
    either one can be used for Tx and Rx  (thus half duplex)

    AF11x =  Traditional Licensed radio... one channel/polarity for
    TX  and one channel/polarity for RX
    Mimosa B11 =  Disruptive... a very odd animal... can be
    configured as...
                                            Use one channel (both
    polarities)  for TX  and one channel (both polarities) for RX
                                 or ... Use Two Channels, both
    polarities in each channel, and use either one to TX & RX  (more
    like a dual channel MIMO)
    AF5  =    Uses one channel (both polarities) for Tx and one
    channel (both polarities) for RX

    AF24 =   can be used as
                                       One Channel (Dual Polarities)
    for TX  and one Channel (Dual Polarities) for RX
                                       or can use the same one
    channel (dual polarities) for Tx and Rx.

    Hope this is as clear as mud !

    :)


    Faisal Imtiaz
    Snappy Internet & Telecom
    7266 SW 48 Street
    Miami, FL 33155
    Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <tel:305%20663%205518%20x%20232>

    Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <tel:%28305%29663-5518> Option 2 or
    Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        *From: *"George Skorup" <[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent: *Monday, October 24, 2016 7:09:11 PM
        *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

        What's so much different between XPIC and MIMO? I'm asking
        because I guess I'm just ignorant. MIMO = single carrier (is
        OFDM implied?), dual streams? And XPIC = dual carriers (is
        single-carrier QAM per channel implied?) and independent
        streams that are aggregated in hardware, perhaps as simple as
        a LAG on the internal switch? Or does XPIC add some more magic?

        So then what is the UBNT AF11X considered? Or the AF5 and 24
        for that matter since they're also capable of FDD.

        On 10/24/2016 5:23 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

            Can a non-vendor tell me if at higher order modulations
            if there's limiting gain from co-channel XPIC? I assume
            it works to some degree because it's marketed (yes, I
            have a tub of salt over here), but at some point the
            modulations would be sensitive enough where the X-pol
            isolation isn't sufficient?

            Okay, a vendor can if they're more technical than salesy.

            I'm not meaning to imply John was salesy.

            ;-)



            -----
            Mike Hammett
            Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
            
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
            Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
            
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
            The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
            <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>


            <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            *From: *"John Seaman" <[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent: *Monday, October 24, 2016 3:55:17 PM
            *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

            Hi Ken, the Lynx and Orion are largely identical.  The
            biggest difference between the two is that the Orion
            supports XPIC where as the Lynx does not.   Keep in mind
            that either model can be set up for 2+0, but only with
the Orion can both radios operate on the same channel. Other than that, the Orion does offer higher TX power
            (for certain frequencies) compared to the Lynx. However
            with 6 GHz, the TX frequency for Lynx and Orion are the
            same.  Orion also features SynchE/1588 functionality
            which is not found on the Lynx.  Both models now support
            buffer size up to 8 MB.

            John Seaman |Sales|*Trango Systems, Inc. |*
            *+1-858-248-4006 <tel:+1-858-248-4006> *
            **|
            www.trangosys.com <http://trangosys.com/>
            ///Trango Systems <http://www.trangosys.com/>///
            //////
            /Innovating Microwave Backhaul//™/



            On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Ken Hohhof
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Jeremy, I’m trying to remember, can you upgrade that
                Lynx to 2+0 with a license key as long as you don’t
                need XPIC? Trango doesn’t spell it out very well on
                their website, but it looks like the major
                differences between Lynx and Orion are buffer size,
XPIC, and maybe the interface and powering options? So that you could still double the throughput as long
                as you can license a different frequency pair for the
                other polarization.  And the issue of the wired
                interface speed.

                *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy
                *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 10:16 PM
                *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6 GHz system

                I don't know who has the biggest or best, but my 6GHz
                Trango Apex Lynx has been rock solid for going on
                four years now.  It does 700Mbps FDX.  I believe that
                the Trango Orion has XPIC up to 1.5Gbps in a 56Mhz
                channel.

                On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Josh Reynolds
                <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                wrote:

                    Why in the world would they buy Exalt?

                    On Oct 21, 2016 8:10 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
                    <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        I thought Crisco bought out Exalt

                        On Oct 21, 2016 5:10 PM, "Ken Hohhof"
                        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                            I thought I got an ad recently from Exalt
                            about a big sale through the end of the
                            year on Extreme Air 6Hz.  Oops, I just
                            found the email, and it’s everything but
                            6 GHz.  Not sure I’d buy Exalt anyway.
                            Maybe someone else was having an
                            overstock sale on 6 GHz?

                            *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
                            <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf
                            Of *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                            *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 5:50 PM
                            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6
                            GHz system

                            First I have to find out if there are
                            channels in this area.

                            Then I have a passive repeater to deal
                            with...

                            Not a simple path to engineer.

                            *From:*Daniel White

                            *Sent:*Friday, October 21, 2016 4:33 PM

                            *To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

                            *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Highest capacity 6
                            GHz system

                            Well you can only use 60MHz channels max.
                            That helps make it more competitive.

                            6GHz most likely precludes higher
                            modulations… you just won’t have the link
                            budget.  Also depends if you’re going all
                            outdoor or split-mount/all-indoor.

                            I’d be shocked if there is a winner here
                            – I’d go with the solution your most
                            comfortable with.

                            My guess is you will end up with
                            Ceragon/Cambium or SIAE. DragonWave
                            Harmony Advanced is certainly worth a
                            look, although I’m not sure about 6GHz
                            availability since it just started shipping.

                            Chuck feel free to contact me offlist and
                            we could look at some things.

                            Daniel White

                            Managing Director – Hardware Distribution
                            Sales

                            ConVergence Technologies

                            Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
                            <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

                            [email protected]
                            <mailto:[email protected]>

    ...


Reply via email to