How much will the 450m help with the downlink data rates? IIRC, it adds a couple dB to a link, but it sounds like he needs to add 10 dB to his links.
This is a prime example of throwing money at the problem isn't going to solve the problem. You have to fix the installation quality control. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Schmaderer" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:45:37 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 vs 450i Remember that even a couple of sms runing at 2x or 4x will kill your peak performance if they are the ones that are usually streaming. We are very careful on what aps we put low signals on and we control what plans we offer as well based on signal strength. I just can not have a 2x customer want a 10mb plan. I do think that a 450i will definitely help with uplink interference like others have said. But i think your best bet is to drop the cash and put some 450m up on that tower. Sounds like that is a cash cow tower like my main tower is. From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Jon Langeler <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:18:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 vs 450i Put a Mikrotik behind an SM and speed test to the internet Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Brian Sullivan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I would check out page 9-51 in the PMP 450x Configuration and User Guide > 15.0.2 > >> On 1/19/2017 11:37 AM, Tushar Patel wrote: >> So how can we tell when we are really saturating the connection? >
