Older GigE surge suppressors would cause them to run at 100 Mbps.  Easy to just 
bypass them with a cat5 coupler to see if they are causing the problem.  Also, 
ground problems will cause this.  

We have had more problems with epmp than any other product with issues like 
this.  

From: Steve Jones 
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:36 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new PacketFlux injectors

This is off topic, but semi related. I very much appreciate the vendors here, 
Packetflux and Mccown tech in particular. 

We recently paid a fairly substantial amount to have a contractor build out a 
site. Tho of the EPMP fed from powerinjectors are flapping ports. Theyre both 
going through Gigeapc cards.

there was an issue with the contractor and scheduling, got us a free day of 
labor, cant complain. then there was an issue with a northwest radio showing up 
southwest.

the flapping on top of the scheduling and the questionable direction of the 
hang would have resulted in an end to a relationship

but knowing I preprogrammed the units, it could be that i flipped two of the 
configs, but flapping ports and the scheduling issue alone would cost most 
contractors the benefit of the doubt.

but there is honesty among vendors, the two mentioned in particular. I may 
still fire the guys, but I know there is a known issue, so it buys them a break 
til I get up and verify.

Neither vendor when this was brought up dismissed it like many bigger vendors 
would. Not naming names, (cambium, ubnt, last mile gear) but alot of vendors 
make you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that your issues are their problem. 
Both packetflux and mccowntech basically say "get this equipment on our bench 
so we can see if there is a problem". thats important on a WISP budget.

A side effect of companies who under rug their problems is the loss of tertiary 
relationships that in the long term could benefit a company, like contractors 
doing site builds for a high price, that overall is less than a full time on 
staff crew.

Im might be a prick, but I do appreciate this openness from these two, and many 
of the others who lurk in this list

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

  That's part of the reason that's going to go later. 

  In my mind, there needs to be a small-form-factor version of the cambium sync 
version for 450i/450m.   I also need to consider whether or not to embed the 
web-based controller in the unit or not, or offer both versions.   After we get 
the rackmount out and the cambium sync card for the rackmount controller out, 
we will take some time to look at what needs to be in our 'small enclosure' 
product.   I'm pretty sure that a lot of the larger sites will simply move to 
the rackmount version.   With these out of the way then we can look more 
closely at how people build small sites and make sure this product fits that 
space well.



  On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:07 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Do you intend to support Cambium Sync on the 12-port DIN as well? That 
would be pretty cool. Looking forward to both products. For now I guess I can 
stack another 4-port PowerInjector and get what I need.


    On 4/12/2017 5:50 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:

      Well, I'm off to bed, looks like I've finally got the pieces all wired to 
test signal through the ethernet magnetics...  got to write the test procedure 
tomorrow. 

      This test equipment has (and will probably continue to be for a bit more) 
been a bit of a challenge as it's sort of an erector set - I've got all of the 
pieces I need to build the automatic test equipment I need (signal generators, 
oscilloscopes with pass/fail, relay switching, etc), but both wiring and how to 
actually program it for testing is left as an exercise for the reader.   I'm 
pretty certain I'm at the stage where I can actually start to write test 
procedures, with (almost) all the wiring done - I'm just missing a few cables 
which should be here in the next couple of days.



      On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        We're in the process of getting the manufacturing side of things up to 
speed.  The product is for all intents and purposes done and we could make and 
ship untested products at this point, as everything is ready to go, except for 
testing and a couple of non-critical remaining software items.  The automatic 
test equipment we're putting in place to test and calibrate these is turning 
out to be a bit more complex than we had hoped, and I don't want to ship these 
without adequate testing.  I've been putting in 16 hour days trying to get this 
completed, but it seems that it's fighting me every step of the way.   I've 
told people that the expected date is the end of this month.  I'm still hopeful 
we'll make this, as things seem to be progressing much more quickly with the 
test equipment than it was a week ago.   But it also wouldn't surprise me if 
it's a week or two late.    

        The only thing we've really got holding things up is getting this test 
equipment running and doing final calibration integration in the software.   
The calibration process generates a calibration file which ends up permanently 
in the device and the software to read this isn't done, mainly because we don't 
have a sample calibration file yet.

        The 12 port DIN is likely going to be a while....  maybe fall at this 
point.  You can thank medusa for that at this point, as I've got to finish up 
the medusa-compatible sync over power product(s) first...



        On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:57 PM, George Skorup 
<[email protected]> wrote:

          So... when is the RackInjector supposed to start shipping? Got a site 
with an 8-port injector and a SyncInjector and now need to add a couple more 
APs. So might as well replace it all with a RackInjector and gain a couple 
ports in the process. It's the towers that you never expected to have 15+ 
radios.

          And 12-port DIN PowerInjector+Sync? Got more smaller sites to upgrade 
too this spring and would be handy to have.





        -- 

              Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

              Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 
59602
              [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com

                 







      -- 

            Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

            Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
            [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com

               









  -- 

        Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

        Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
        [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com

           



Reply via email to