On Thursday, October 08, 2026, at 3:18 PM, Quan Tesla wrote: > I had a good look at the whole pdf text and did experimental integration > across various domains. Critically, there's no real synthesis to this or > advancement of application value, except for the rigorous parts, which were > pre-existing. I tried a Betti integration with Anthropic Jacobian space, but > that seemingly "failed". Gemini was in a slaughterhouse "mood". Maybe Qwen or > Claude would do better.
I gone through MANY of these unification theories and TOE’s over the years and each time I learn something new with new techniques and perspectives. They are full of knowledge even if they break down as a whole. It’s more like software to me where you read code from different engineers and platforms and learn their skills and knowledge so I see nothing wrong with evaluating. It’s not like I’m going all in on it. To me they’re bugs. So what? You find a bug, chuck the theory and call the author a kook? I look for usable pieces, some of the other PDF's are packed with material. An ultimate goal of a software developer might go from tapping a keyboard while sitting behind a screen, to telling an AI what to code, to eventually programming matter and energy from thought. And more hard scientists and engineers are thinking like software engineers. Most people would not go and read Mentifex’s code. I did and by doing that I could see how his mind worked, which was a curiosity in itself LOL. Same with theories you learn how the authors think. And I read theories that are way out there trying piece together the big picture that only a handful of people know and merely mentioning it gets you labeled a nutjob. Contemporary culture is changing though where that type of investigation is becoming more mainstream. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-M9be9f08619094341bc42cd62 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
