Quan, thanks for the AI debunking of the Logvinivich alchemy Pb->Au paper. Likewise the IT3 paper is nonsense too. I'm not going to bother with a point by point deconstruction. I have better things to do with my time. If I wanted to learn more about physics I would start with Wikipedia, not someone who throws together a bunch of jargon to make outlandish claims to gain attention rather than do actual research.
Anyway if you wanted to know more about the fine structure constant (alpha), it is the square of the ratio between Planck units and Stoney units. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoney_units Planck units are derived from the gravitational constant G, the speed of light c, and reduced Planck constant h_bar. Stoney units replace h_bar with the unit charge force constant, k. The ratio of the two is a measure of the strength of the electrical force that binds atoms together. The multiverse theory it says that all possible values of alpha exist in some universe but we necessarily observe a value that allows the evolution of intelligence life. If the electrical force was stronger, then melting and boiling points would be higher and chemical reaction rates lower relative to temperature and solid materials would be stronger and denser. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] On Thu, Oct 8, 2026, 10:24 AM John Rose via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, October 08, 2026, at 7:47 AM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > The FSC is a constant. No one has derived its value. It manifests and > operates in the shadow of observable reality. In a limited theoretical > consideration, if the FSC were instantiated in a superoperator/modulator > role, constant scalar transformations seem to result. > > > A running coupling constant since it's value may vary slightly in > different parts of the universe and vacuum polarization. > > On Thursday, October 08, 2026, at 7:47 AM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > Let me rephrase your assertion as follows: In a dynamical system, an FSM > would occupy a lowest state. It's isolated as the lowest machine state and > nothing else of and by itself, the bottom of the Chomsky hierarchy with the > least memory. A system with no memory beyond its current state cannot have > a non-trivial Betti number, a Gödel sentence and no retrocausal budget. It > has only the state "token" value, topologically trivial. The 3 registers > mentioned are 3 labels on the current state, not 3 topological axes. > > > The FSM registers are extended from his framework. Mapping macro and micro > using cubical geometry and prime indexing. Funny I was looking into this > exact same thing like 35 years ago when I naively thought I could develop a > general compression algorithm. Weird. > > https://zenodo.org/records/19694575 > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-M71a23bb6a34d6e31d1558896> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-Mcde32f8823d0c5abaa82f0a7 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
