Sorry I don't follow you... Can you link with some papers that go into detail about "quick *shape*-matching and guesswork" - or explain to me how this works exactly?
Furthermore you state that your shape matching is going to match water (you even use a probability of "pretty likely" which negates pretty much everything you've said so far) - I could get water and urine making similar shapes - and with more difficulty, semen too, so how does your quick shape matching and guesswork algorithms choose between either? I feel like your just trolling now. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote: > P.S. When I say "quick SHAPE-matching.." - I think that is the *main* > approach, but the brain is obviously sensitive to other dimensions like > colour and texture etc... Come to think of it, evolution probably shows > rough shape-matching to be prior in history, & the other dimensions of > sophisticated human and higher animal vision to come later, no? > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/22581513-9fe46a1c > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
