On 24/11/2007, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Linas, > > I'm not asking for much more than brief exposition of ideas in this > forum, that just begin to show some promise. I'm not demanding or expecting > something fully worked through. The fact remains that I don't think I've > heard any in any form that fit the critera below - and you don't actually > mention any. >
What, a breif expositition of workable ideas that haven't yet been explored? I dunno, I've read of various on the net, I've discussed some on this mailing list. Let's not rehash old conversations. Clearly some people here like to shooot down ideas. That doesn't mean that they're bad ideas. I've received emails in private, from folks held up as "leading lights in AGI", who said things like "you're on the right track" (and no, that wasn't Ben). So I think the academic side of AGI has some mutual respect for one-another, and they think they have promsing ideas (even if you don't) and they're not done with thier researches, and they haven't given up. --linas ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=68371477-3a8f89
