Günther Greindl wrote:
Hi guys,

I though this might be interesting:
http://www.surrey.ac.uk/qe/cemi.htm

His thesis is that consciousness is not generated by the neurons firing and computing, but rather the electromagnetic (EM) field generated by the neurons is consciousness - being conscious is then how it feels how to be an em field (of a certain kind) from the inside, so to speak.

What do you think? This would be important for AGI and would explain why usual computational models, which do not seek to generate physical em fields but remain in the abstract fail to produce conscious AIs.

Best Regards,
Günther

This is complete and utter nonsense (sorry!).

It says, in effect "Hey, the explanation of consciousness is that it is caused by X" where X is something that explains absolutely nothing about whatever consciousness is supposed to be. Moreover, the person espousing the theory, you can bet, will not be able to state exactly what they think "consciousness" actually is... they will just be able to tell you that, whatever it is, their candidate explains it.

I could just as easily say that consciousness is explained by ... hair follicles. This Hair Follicle Theory of Consciousness would have the same qualifications to be considered the correct theory.

There are more theories of consciousness of this sort than you can swing a cat at. Go to the Tucson Conference in a few months' time and you will be able to listen to at least fifty of them.



Richard Loosemore

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=89270768-7406da

Reply via email to