On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 11:52 pm, Shane Isbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it's okay for Google to crush future, non-existent projects. It just > > mean that those developers will put their time into some other project, > no > > time or energy wasted. > > > > That assumes they will give you plenty of advance notice, like 6 > months to a year. I recall there was wasted effort in alternate > solutions up until the minute LVL was announced, because it indeed > looked like Google was never going to do anything about the problem. > Yeah, that was a bad move by Google, they should have supported that particular project. From what I've seen, best to stay away from anything regarding infrastructure (or supporting developer services). Google is going to crush those projects eventually. I would guess that the latest web-based market (a good move by Google) will do away with alternate stores like SlideME, within short order. Shane -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
