Ricsi wrote:
> B> But if pages could be accesible even without JavaScript, Java, CSS and
> B> Shockwave I think we all would be alot happier.
>I agree ... 100%
>But if done intelligently than you can benefit if these additions are
>installed, and if your browser doesn't support it/or if they are disabled,
>than you can still retrieve the information ...
>
>The problem is that there are many sites NOT intelligently made :))
Yes LucasArts (http://www.lucasarts.com/) for instance was accesible
earlier but has recently become much harder to use (it can be used but
requires that you look in the code to see where the links actually go at
some places).
Another site that's a perfect example how one shouldn't do is Geri
Halliwells official site (http://www.geri-halliwell.com) - it requires both
JS and CSS do be operational at all. (Once again you can of course read the
HTML files to see where links go, but she ain't that good-looking to keep
my interest up on those pages).
A site that I recently noticed gave me trouble (even with Netscape 4.x in
Linux with all things turned on) was (http://www.multidirect.se/) - I guess
I'll buy my hardware somewhere else (oh wait I'm already doing that anyway
since several years back <g>).
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
