How about we permit it only to orgs that can demonstrate the existence
and adherence to an IPv6 migration plan?
Ted
On 5/28/2015 5:27 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Or simply not permit it under ARIN policy until such exists.
Owen
On May 28, 2015, at 1:49 PM, John Curran<[email protected]> wrote:
On May 27, 2015, at 11:39 PM, Owen DeLong<[email protected]> wrote:
My suggestion is that I don't mind (virtually) unrestricted moves of addresses
to different regions staying with the same organization. However, if we are to
allow that, I want us to find a way that you can't merely use that as a way to
move addresses out of flip protection to then flip them to another organization
via an RIR with a less restrictive transfer policy.
So... If you transfer addresses to another region, keeping them in the same
organization, no penalty. However, you are not allowed to subsequently transfer
them (or other addresses in that region) to an external party for at least 12
months.
That second portion that you seek would affect the ongoing operation of
another RIR, i.e. it requires them having some explicit policy to that effect.
To obtain the result you seek, we either need globally coordinated transfer
policy in this area, or you need to make the inter-RIR transfer policy explicit
in this regard in determination of compatibility.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
