All true,,, Hmmm,,, how much of that was "taken" from all the workflow we sent in to have them analyze it for us... Some of the stuff in the ITSM suite many of us did years ago... the role based permissions and multi tenancy option to name a few. It may not have been in the same format as BMC developed it,,, however some of those "ideas" came from out in the trenches so to speak,,, not originally from BMC.
BTW,, thanks for all the feedback on IBM MRO,,, it looks like a very interesting... I'm curious to see what happens over the next couple of years... -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IBM MRO? Well...I think asking a vendor to open the source to a commercial product is definitely dreaming. Open the source so a competitor can steal your intellectual property? I don't think so... -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IBM MRO? Ah... while we are dreaming..... How about they open access to their source code for their paying customers. ( They do not even have to change the licensing model to do that.) Just let us see the real code. If they are still wanting to keep things locked down... then they can keep some parts closed source too. That way they build "platform presence" and can get their customers to actually help them fix BUGS in their code. :) The real root problem (IMHO) they think that they can make more money the way they are running the business now. Only time will tell if some competitor comes and eats their lunch , or some portion of it, or maybe they will adapt when they think they have no other choice. -- Carey Matthew Black Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP) ARS = Action Request System(Remedy) Love, then teach Solution = People + Process + Tools Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two. On 9/21/07, John Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** > Just an idea. > > How about selling a stripped down ARServer that only can run one > application. > > The server would be open to all users (no licenses) for that one > application. (BMC would not get license revenue per user) -- however they > would get revenue for the server license -- and they would grow their > partner channel and the platform presence. > > That server would only exist for "registered/approved" applications. So - if > somebody wants a generic ARServer for their own internal app -- they would > buy a normal ARServer and user licenses. > > > -John ________________________________________________________________________ _______ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are" ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
