Rune's got a point... if they are picky about this issue, they're in for a 
world o hurt! J

 

Tauf Chowdhury 

Analyst, Service Management

Office: 631.858.7765

Mobile:646.483.2779

 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rune Sørlid
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is there a way around requiring a 3rd Tier Product Category

 

** 

 

Hi John.

 

If that frustrates your users, I think you have more problem to come.

 

Have you tried Templates or Decision tree?

 

/Rune

 

 

From: Bilinski, John <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:33 PM

Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: Is there a way around requiring a 3rd Tier Product Category

 

** 

Thanks for the suggestion Rune, but is there any way to disable the 3rd Tier 
altogether? Having the First Tier of PC be the ITSM Module Name will frustrate 
the users because they will have to always select 3 tiers to get to the Product 
Name (if they choose to use the menus).

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rune Sørlid
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is there a way around requiring a 3rd Tier Product Category

** 

Hi John.

 

Why dont you use a 1.st Tier that shows wich Application your in?

 

Tier 1 = "Incident Management".. Remember that the important field is 'Product 
Name', because of the search possibilities....

 

/Rune Sorlid

 

 

From: Bilinski, John <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 3:07 PM

Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Is there a way around requiring a 3rd Tier Product Category

 

** 

All,

 

Is there any way to get around having a 3rd Tier for Product Categorization in 
Incident Mgmt 7.5? We have no need for a 3rd Tier Prod Cat and want to find a 
way around the required 3rd tier without making a customization to the ITSM 
workflow. Does anyone have any suggestions?

 

Thanks. 

 

John Bilinski

Department of Justice

Operations Services Staff

_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

 

_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 
_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

 

_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

**********************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to