Jeroen van Aart wrote: > That is a matter of taste, I know a number of people who use > it as their main client.
I guess so > Yeah, as a plugin, works nice I am sure. You don't need an > email server for that. I would say a dedicated protocol works > much better. How can you "easily" collaborate between hundreds/thousands of people without the use of a server? Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe I don't understand you. But yeah, TCP/IP would be my choice(which is what every email client uses now days). The server based version of collaboration is not done over the SMTP protocol (at least not in Outlook). My philosophy when it comes to end-users is: KISS (keep it simple stupid). Otherwise, it goes over their head (unless they're techno-philiacs). > But they work. :-) And so does your memory. I personally > remember all my appointments, it's old school I know. I guess you have an exceptionally good memory. I know a lot of people that don't know what's in the next 30 minutes. > No it sounds like a long history of mistreating email, one of > the results you can see right here, aka spam. Spam is a prime > example of what mistreating a protocol can lead to. In this > case mainly a lax approach in the earlier years, something > we're constantly paying the price for. And I doubt it's going away. > It sounds more like you did have too much coffee. I don't drink/eat/inhale/do stimulants (not even caffeine...most of the time). > Actually I doubt that. Difference of opinion I guess. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
