bhaagensen wrote: > At some point you have to acknowledge that not everyone agrees with you > in this - its a premise of this entire discussion - like it or not. > > Anyway. The point is that USB is a better protocol and using it avoids > the hoops one has to go through to achieve something similar over an > spdif-link. Adsitionally I suspekt the hardware costs of USB are as > insignificant as for spdif. I have only little knowledge inside the > electronics enterprises, so I wont predict, but a shift to USB makes > sense. > > (Just to be clear, (boutique) highfi is not going to set the agenda in > this development anyway)
You're right not everyone agrees with me but if you discount the clowns who write for the high end rags (and they are clowns because clowns make you laugh and their writing is such a joke that it often makes me laugh) then you will find that few people who know what they are talking about disagree with me. Here's just one of them: http://davidkessner.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/a-pragmatic-approach-to-jitter-in-digital-audio/ Enjoy and LEARN. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97489 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
