erm...APF! ....its meant to be APF! ;)

On 5/25/07, A J W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer the idea of someone who packs 'chutes regularly, who has a
> predefined interest in it and who's chutes actually get opened
> regularly, packing my 'chute. If his credentials are to the AFP
> standard and remains current with regard to AFP insurance and the GFA
> can organise insurance cover, this may well be better, although a
> touch dearer, way to go.
>
> I'm not in the insurance industry, but experience in a field usually
> counts for something, and I'm sure this applies to parachute packing
> as well.
>
> A.J.
>
> On 5/25/07, Ben Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok I maybe thinking completely out of the box here.... but what if ??
> >
> > Scenario .
> >
> > GFA calls for interested people to put up there hand who are qualified to
> > re-pack chutes, or people who would like to be trained as a repacker, who
> > are members of the gfa ( a nice figure would be 2 per state)
> >
> > GFA nominates one individual to oversee re-packing operations eg: "Parachute
> > Operations Officer"
> >
> > GFA as a organisation applies to CASA for a CAO 30 Cert of Approval for
> > members only chute packing.
> >
> > Each nominated person in every state works under the direction of "Parachute
> > Operations Officer" , who would then be covered under a extra insurance
> > policy for chute packing taken out by the GFA,
> >
> > If a average chute re pack costs lets say $ 60.00 which I think the going
> > rate is ,  $25.00 would go to the packer for his/her time and $35.00 is paid
> > to the GFA to cover costs of the insurance policy.
> >
> > Yes I know (before people put a chainsaw through my thoughts) it will be a
> > paper war to get the organisation approved and to find people, but the down
> > fall of a lot or organisations is the reliance of a external party to help
> > them keep there compliance ...... i.e. relying on the APF to repack our
> > chutes until the legal issues crept up, which now have basically shafted the
> > pilots of the GFA.
> >
> > Lets continue to work out the legal issues with the APF but get our own
> > approval, then the problem should not re-occur then every one and clubs who
> > own chutes should have no reason to keep out of dates chutes, thus negating
> > the debate about flying with time-ex chutes.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ben "Hops off soap box" Jones
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >> The Nationals Rules state that a parachute is mandatory equipment and
> > >> must be worn during flight.  They do not say that the parachute must
> > >> have a current packing slip.
> > >
> > > They don't need to.  The GFA operational regulations say that a
> > > parachute must be "current":
> > >
> > > Section 11 - Parachutes
> > > 11.1. A serviceable parachute shall be worn by each occupant of a
> > > sailplane
> > > taking part in a GFA recognised contest.
> > > 11.2. A parachute is not considered to be serviceable unless it has been
> > > inspected and repacked in accordance with the parachute manufacturer's
> > > maintenance requirements.
> > > This may be carried out by a person qualified under CAR 30 or by a
> > > parachuting
> > > organization approved by CASA.  Unless a shorter time interval is
> > > specified, an
> > > inspection is valid for six months.
> > >
> > >
> > > So --
> > >
> > > When the manufacturer says "8 months", the Operational Regulations
> > > override
> > > it and reduce it to 6.  Carrying a _serviceable_ parachute in a GFA comp
> > > is
> > > mandatory regardless of whether or not the rules mention it, and the
> > > parachute is not _serviceable_ unless it meets the repacking
> > > requirement.
> > >
> > > The National Rules no doubt fail to mention this stuff because they
> > > don't
> > > need to mention it, because it's "the law of the land" whether they
> > > mention
> > > it or not (for pilots flying under the auspices of CASA's delegation to
> > > GFA,
> > > who are therefore governed by the opregs and the MOSP)
> > >
> > >
> > >    - mark
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > I tried an internal modem,                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >      but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
> > > ----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82356937 -----
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aus-soaring mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To check or change subscription details, visit:
> > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to