Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
As to the various flavors of "emphasis": Perhaps we should adopt the same or similar terms for them that Word 2007 does, so that their usage would be more "catholic" (lowercase usage).

I don't see why we should modify names in our templates (which are for our own internal use) to be consistent with MSWord (2007 or any other version). If someone (yourself, for example) wishes to adapt our template for more general use, they can easily change the style names to suit their own preferences or needs.

--Jean
It's just that Word already has defaults/predefines for various flavors of "Emphasis". Maintaining parallelism with those would be easier to remember or to apply for those who might utilize our template(s) for their own personal use.

But, there should be no attempt to substitute Word's Normal or Strong for OOo's Default and Strong Emphasis paragraph styles, respectively. But OOo only has one Emphasis default, whereas Word has three (or more) Emphasis defaults. I think--Emphasis, Intense Emphasis, and Subtle Emphasis--all italic. Having a couple extra "Emphasis" styles couldn't hurt, and they might even come in handy.

Gary

--

Gary Schnabl
2775 Honorah
Detroit MI 48209

Reply via email to