More info: the OOo heading styles in the old (2.x) template have different names from the OOo heading styles in the new template, so you need to do a search-and-replace to change them after you put a chapter into the new template. Same for paragraph styles for lists. In fact, most of the lists used to be in OOoTextBody with manually-applied list styles; now they use proper paragraph styles for lists -- and therefore they all need to be changed in the file when converting it.

If you're not familiar with both the old and new templates (and there is no reason why you should be, at this point), it can be quite confusing to update an v2.x user guide file to the v3.0 template, because you won't know what to look for. We haven't written a how-to on this, because up to now the few people doing conversions have been familiar with the discussions on the new template.

It's very fiddly at first, until you get used to it. If you find doing the conversion too frustrating, you're allowed to just concentrate on updating the content, adding new content, or whatever is needed, and one of us can tidy up the template issues. Of course, if you can do it all, that's even better.

--Jean

Camillus Gerard Cai wrote:
Alright, thanks for the pointer. Regards
Camillus Gerard Cai.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Hollis Weber [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 30 January, 2009 9:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [authors] Problem with new template or bug?

The OOoTextBody style has extra space below it, and the various OOoHeading styles have extra space above and below, so you should not need to do anything manually regarding spacing.

DO NOT use carriage returns to introduce more space.

--Jean

Camillus Gerard Cai wrote:
Okay understood. So just to confirm, between consecutive paragraphs of text under the same
subheading, do you increase the line spacing of the last line, or leave an
extra carraige return at the end (/n/n) to seperate the two?



Reply via email to