Hi all “translaters”.
It looks like this is not the same Sabina (sorry to say) In the Baptism you have a married man fooling around with a unmarried woman!!! But he recognizes his daughter on the baptismal act. The first question is: why does not the priest says the child was not legitimate (filha natural)??? Due to the recognition by the father in the act??? May be, but ist was mandatory to write that the child was not legitimate. Second question is: Why are the names so different from the marriage record? The mother of Sabina is listed as Domingas de S. Miguel in the marriage record. Sabina’s father is listed as João de Sousa and at the Baptismal record he is António de Sousa… Last question: Are you sure that these are de right records for Sabina? Eliseu Pacheco da Silva Researching S. Miguel and Graciosa: PACHECO, ARRUDA, SILVA, SOUSA, BETTENCOURT Azores Genealogy Group - I am proud of my membership!!! Thanks Cheri!!! -- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. Follow the confirmation directions when they arrive. For more options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail (vacation) mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Azores. Click in the blue area on the right that says "Join this group" and it will take you to "Edit my membership."
