> Actually, you're wrong. You may not have realized, but the difference  
> between metal and normal windows has been reduced significantly. So  
> much even that you did not even realize that iCal uses non-metal  
> windows!

Well, whatever those are called these days, I stopped keeping track of Apple’s 
ever new inconsistencies and fads a while ago. Yet the general style of the 
window keeps having the ‚metal‘ taste: because of the ‚unified‘ toolbar, the 
draggable bottom bar and the rounded corners at the bottom. I think these kinds 
of windows inherit from what used to be metal (as opposed to simple document 
windows without the huge bar and rounded edges at the bottom). iCal’s window is 
definitely in the metal-ish style (rounded corners at the bottom), while, say, 
XCode (proper corners, non-draggable status bar) is more like a traditional 
document window; Safari seems to cover the middle ground (proper corners, but 
draggable status bar). 

> iCal uses the exact same style as the current BD source, the  
> only difference is that it uses a bottom bar with large controls  
> rather than one with small controls, but both are standard. I think  
> small is more appropriate, I think the large controls get a far too  
> big bottom bar.

Actually I think this is the main reason why don’t like this style of bottom 
bar. Because you will need a lot of space between the buttons and its edges, 
buttons consume a load of extra space there which cannot be used to make them 
more useful.

> As for the window being draggable by the status bar, that is automatic  
> (just try).

Of course I did try and it didn’t work, which is why I noted it. It seems to be 
a bug which appears when you turn on the status bar and then try to drag the 
window in the status bar.

> You may also compare iTunes and iPhoto, which are perhaps  
> much more similar to BD, and have a similar bottom bar.

Despite having a source list, I don’t really think of BibDesk as being in the 
iPhoto/iTunes class. Those always have a gratuitous / fun aspect to me and 
cannot handle multiple documents while I think BibDesk should feel like a work 
application that can handle multiple documents. Hence I’d expect it to look 
more like a text editor or, say, Mail. 

                Sven

-- 
Sven-S. Porst . http://earthlingsoft.net/ssp . AIM: cv47al
Pass as best inventor!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop

Reply via email to