You set the saw blade on the inside cut of the 45.. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Scott Howell 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 8:36 AM
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] mitering trim


  Owch, your killing me my friend. Ok, let me explain a bit more. This 
  room currently has no baseboards at all, they were all pulled and 
  stupid me tossed them out or I could have used them as a template. So, 
  what I'm doing is measuring with a ruler on the length of this piece 
  of wall. This wall is basically what separates two stairwells. So, the 
  length from corner to corner is 6 and 3/4 inches. In this case, these 
  are two outside corners. So, if this were a simple straight cut, I'd 
  measure on the saw the length and just cut. However, because I want a 
  45-degree angle, it would seem that you'd nearly have to include some 
  length for that angle so it juts out far enough to mate up with the 
  other pieces at either end that are also cut at a 45-degree angle. I 
  agree you have to take into consideration the width of the blade etc. 
  I imagine and not being a math wiz at all, the simple tilting of the 
  blade from a 0 position to a 45-degree position would mean you'd have 
  to add on some extra in order to compensate for the angled cut or am I 
  just full of crap and have no clue what I'm talking about.
  I'm not using my table saw, I don't see this as a job for that, I 
  instead am using my miter saw. Additionally, are you saying a coping 
  saw might help with the inside corners? Can a blind person effectively 
  use a coping saw? I thought I had seen a post that said it would be 
  very difficult for a blind person to use a coping saw. Being as I'm 
  not an expert on anything woodworking related, but trying to learn, 
  I'm in no position to say one way or the other on coping saws and 
  their use.
  So, I'm open to any ideas, but would of course like to make as few 
  trips from the basement to the saw work location.

  tnx

  On Jul 6, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Dale Leavens wrote:

  > Where are you mitering to?
  >
  > The usual way to fit baseboards is to cope the inside corners and 
  > only miter the outside corners. The next problem is setting the saw 
  > correctly. Sighted people have to worry about parallax, that is, 
  > looking straight on at a ruler or the line marked on stock to be 
  > cut. We have another problem, the edge of a tape measure or even a 
  > story stick has some thickness and the kerf of a saw blade has some 
  > thickness more than the body of the blade. Then, are you measuring 
  > to the same side of the blade? Not a silly question but an easy 
  > enough error to make and modern carbide blades take out nearly an 
  > eight of an inch of material when they cut. Finally, if you are 
  > using a talking tape measure you are only accurate to within a 16th 
  > of an inch. add to that you could be measuring on the shy side of 
  > the 16th and transferring to the proud side of the 16th and you 
  > could be off nearly an eighth. Add that to the mating piece and you 
  > could be off nearly a quarter of an inch.
  >
  > Even professionals though do often sneak up on a cut with power 
  > equipment.
  >
  > If measuring inside corner to inside corner then the narrowest 
  > dimension over the width of the trim is the correct measure on the 
  > long (back) side. If you are using the face then you must subtract 
  > twice the thickness of the trim material. Measuring the face though 
  > is very difficult to do accurately because you can't get your 
  > measuring device snug into the angle where the tip of the teeth meet 
  > the board. Sighted people look down to the point where the teeth 
  > will be just clipping off the pencil line and they will use a very 
  > sharp pencil to draw a very thin crisp line.
  >
  > At the other side, because the teeth attack on the outer angle your 
  > measuring device will either be nearly the thickness of the blade 
  > away from where the outer edge will shave off the wood or it will be 
  > the thickness of the blade too short, a distance increased by the 45 
  > degree angle which is the root of the sum of the squares of which 
  > the thickness of the blade forms the hypotenuse.
  >
  > Eventually though you do learn to fudge the measure a little to get 
  > you very close. With a good miter saw or well tuned and highly 
  > accurate table saw and the material well fixed down it is possible 
  > to shave a whisker off of a cut which brings us back to that 
  > recently and lengthy discussion of inexpensive table saws. It 
  > doesn't take long to spend several hundred dollars on waste material.
  >
  > ----- Original Message ----- From: Scott Howell
  > To: [email protected]
  > Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 2:35 PM
  > Subject: [BlindHandyMan] mitering trim
  > ,Folks, I'm in the process of cutting baseboard and the like to 
  > install
  > in the living room after the flooring project. Now for some reason I
  > just can't seem to get this baseboard cut properly. I have lets say a
  > measurement of 6 3/4 and I place the baseboard on the miter saw and I
  > have tried both measuring with the blade at a 0 angle and then also at
  > the proper 45 degree angle. In both cases it seems that it's just not
  > coming out right, it comes out to short. So, can someone offer some
  > tips on mitering trim so when I cut the pieces, I get the 6 3/4 I need
  > and the ends will stick out enough to mate up with the other 45-degree
  > angles to cover the corner? If this didn't make sense, please let me
  > know.
  > I'd like to get this right and not waste a lot of material.
  >
  > tnx
  >
  > Scott Howell
  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  >
  > ----------------------------------------------------------
  >
  > No virus found in this incoming message.
  > Checked by AVG.
  > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.5/1537 - Release Date: 
  > 7/6/2008 5:26 AM
  >
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >
  >
  > 

  Scott Howell
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to