I'll add a note, but this is actually deliberate. *.foo.com does not match foo.com.
~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 10:19 ayumi hamasaki <ayumih...@gmail.com> wrote: > The example in the description is a bit confusing found here: > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170361717489664 > > Before, a permissions policy might need to look like: > > ``` > permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; " > https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";) > ``` > > With this feature, it could look like: permissions-policy: > > ``` > ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; "https://*.foo.com";) > ``` > > One would think why not just write: `ch-ua-platform-version=(self " > https://*.foo.com";)` instead. As you're used `foo.com` twice! > > ---- > > Would it not be better to use `foo.com` and `example.com` instead e.g. > > Before, a permissions policy might need to look like: > > ``` > permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://example.com > <https://foo.com/>" "https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";) > ``` > > With this feature, it could look like: permissions-policy: > > ``` > ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://example.com <https://foo.com/>" " > https://*.foo.com";) > ``` > > Which would make more sense. > > > On Wednesday, 31 August 2022 at 15:10:31 UTC+1 ari...@chromium.org wrote: > >> Sorry about that: >> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/679 >> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/51 >> >> >> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) >> >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 10:06 Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:27 PM Ari Chivukula <ari...@chromium.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Contact emails >>>> >>>> ari...@chromium.org, mike...@chromium.org >>>> >>>> Design Doc >>>> >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HtkQivbjO6TiP6uZdTt4KmTnWzbs5IZpEdrz59-fyYU/edit >>>> >>>> Specification >>>> >>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/479 >>>> >>>> Summary >>>> >>>> This feature will add support for wildcard in permissions policy >>>> structured like SCHEME://*.HOST:PORT (e.g., https://*.foo.com/) where >>>> a valid Origin could be constructed from SCHEME://HOST:PORT (e.g., >>>> https://foo.com/). This requires that HOST is at least eTLD+1 (a >>>> registrable domain). This means that https://*.bar.foo.com/ works but >>>> https://*.com/ won’t (if you want to allow all domains to use the >>>> feature, you should just delegate to *). Wildcards in the scheme and port >>>> section will be unsupported and https://*.foo.com/ does not delegate >>>> to https://foo.com/. >>>> >>>> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like: >>>> >>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; " >>>> https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";) >>>> >>>> With this feature, it could look like: >>>> >>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; >>>> "https://*.foo.com";) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Blink component >>>> >>>> Blink>PermissionsAPI >>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPermissionsAPI> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Motivation >>>> >>>> The Permissions Policy specification >>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-permissions-policy/> “defines a >>>> mechanism that allows developers to selectively enable and disable use of >>>> various browser features and APIs.” One capability of this mechanism allows >>>> features to be enabled only on explicitly enumerated origins (e.g., >>>> https://foo.com/). This mechanism is not flexible enough for the >>>> design of some CDNs, which deliver content via an origin that might be >>>> hosted on one of several hundred possible subdomains. >>>> >>>> TAG review >>>> >>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/765 >>>> >>>> Compatibility >>>> >>>> Depending on their user base, sites may want to entertain a transition >>>> period for older Chromium clients, where they enumerate all subdomains and >>>> include the wildcard in the permissions policy. >>>> >>>> >>>> Interoperability >>>> >>>> We would be the first to implement if approved. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Gecko: Will ask >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> WebKit: Will ask >>>> >>> >>> Links to signal requests? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Web developers: >>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/479 >>>> <https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure/issues/108> >>>> >>>> Debuggability >>>> >>>> Future work might flag syntax errors in the Issues tab >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lDEvj8tMeuvUs1HTTqL-44YiI-7ljeQkusM_WhUfIeE/edit> >>>> . >>>> >>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests? >>>> >>>> No, but it will be. >>>> >>>> Tracking bug >>>> >>>> https://crbug.com/1345994 >>>> >>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status >>>> >>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170361717489664 >>>> >>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DLDbhOMWugyzXTKsvjH6koO8g7sV7eg_NQgq0GZeCOQ1A%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DLDbhOMWugyzXTKsvjH6koO8g7sV7eg_NQgq0GZeCOQ1A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2BCusaFBxLhe930f_X%2BvisYes%3DQLOBB8VFevR804kcS_A%40mail.gmail.com.
