There was one comment on the TAG thread: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/765#issuecomment-1245616454
Mozilla just published a positive position: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/679 ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:39 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote: > We discussed this in the API OWNERS meeting today, and given that the TAG > review issue was added to the TPAC milestone for next week, we'd like to > wait a week or so to see if there is any useful feedback. > > On 8/31/22 10:44 AM, Ari Chivukula wrote: > > I'll add a note, but this is actually deliberate. > > *.foo.com does not match foo.com. > > ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 10:19 ayumi hamasaki <ayumih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The example in the description is a bit confusing found here: >> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170361717489664 >> >> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like: >> >> ``` >> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; " >> https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";) >> ``` >> >> With this feature, it could look like: permissions-policy: >> >> ``` >> ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; "https://*.foo.com";) >> ``` >> >> One would think why not just write: `ch-ua-platform-version=(self " >> https://*.foo.com";)` instead. As you're used `foo.com` twice! >> >> ---- >> >> Would it not be better to use `foo.com` and `example.com` instead e.g. >> >> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like: >> >> ``` >> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://example.com >> <https://foo.com/>" "https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";) >> ``` >> >> With this feature, it could look like: permissions-policy: >> >> ``` >> ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://example.com <https://foo.com/>" " >> https://*.foo.com";) >> ``` >> >> Which would make more sense. >> >> >> On Wednesday, 31 August 2022 at 15:10:31 UTC+1 ari...@chromium.org wrote: >> >>> Sorry about that: >>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/679 >>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/51 >>> >>> >>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 10:06 Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:27 PM Ari Chivukula <ari...@chromium.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Contact emails >>>>> >>>>> ari...@chromium.org, mike...@chromium.org >>>>> >>>>> Design Doc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HtkQivbjO6TiP6uZdTt4KmTnWzbs5IZpEdrz59-fyYU/edit >>>>> >>>>> Specification >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/479 >>>>> >>>>> Summary >>>>> >>>>> This feature will add support for wildcard in permissions policy >>>>> structured like SCHEME://*.HOST:PORT (e.g., https://*.foo.com/) where >>>>> a valid Origin could be constructed from SCHEME://HOST:PORT (e.g., >>>>> https://foo.com/). This requires that HOST is at least eTLD+1 (a >>>>> registrable domain). This means that https://*.bar.foo.com/ works but >>>>> https://*.com/ won’t (if you want to allow all domains to use the >>>>> feature, you should just delegate to *). Wildcards in the scheme and port >>>>> section will be unsupported and https://*.foo.com/ does not delegate >>>>> to https://foo.com/. >>>>> >>>>> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like: >>>>> >>>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; " >>>>> https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";) >>>>> >>>>> With this feature, it could look like: >>>>> >>>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; >>>>> "https://*.foo.com";) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Blink component >>>>> >>>>> Blink>PermissionsAPI >>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPermissionsAPI> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Motivation >>>>> >>>>> The Permissions Policy specification >>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-permissions-policy/> “defines a >>>>> mechanism that allows developers to selectively enable and disable use of >>>>> various browser features and APIs.” One capability of this mechanism >>>>> allows >>>>> features to be enabled only on explicitly enumerated origins (e.g., >>>>> https://foo.com/). This mechanism is not flexible enough for the >>>>> design of some CDNs, which deliver content via an origin that might be >>>>> hosted on one of several hundred possible subdomains. >>>>> >>>>> TAG review >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/765 >>>>> >>>>> Compatibility >>>>> >>>>> Depending on their user base, sites may want to entertain a transition >>>>> period for older Chromium clients, where they enumerate all subdomains and >>>>> include the wildcard in the permissions policy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Interoperability >>>>> >>>>> We would be the first to implement if approved. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Gecko: Will ask >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> WebKit: Will ask >>>>> >>>> >>>> Links to signal requests? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Web developers: >>>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/479 >>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure/issues/108> >>>>> >>>>> Debuggability >>>>> >>>>> Future work might flag syntax errors in the Issues tab >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lDEvj8tMeuvUs1HTTqL-44YiI-7ljeQkusM_WhUfIeE/edit> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests? >>>>> >>>>> No, but it will be. >>>>> >>>>> Tracking bug >>>>> >>>>> https://crbug.com/1345994 >>>>> >>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status >>>>> >>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170361717489664 >>>>> >>>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DLDbhOMWugyzXTKsvjH6koO8g7sV7eg_NQgq0GZeCOQ1A%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DLDbhOMWugyzXTKsvjH6koO8g7sV7eg_NQgq0GZeCOQ1A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2BCusaFBxLhe930f_X%2BvisYes%3DQLOBB8VFevR804kcS_A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2BCusaFBxLhe930f_X%2BvisYes%3DQLOBB8VFevR804kcS_A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2Bqnrhs1j0YaFFHmJGCzzE2_YMW6yYe1QYX_PezNHWo2Q%40mail.gmail.com.
