Ah, yes I responded to that comment and believe it would be possible to
support that future extension without having to un-ship this version of
wildcards.

~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)


On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:21 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Essentially, this comment
> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/765#issuecomment-1245616454> 
> suggested
> a negation syntax, which looks like a feature request, but may be good to
> ensure that the current parsing algorithm would enable such future
> extensions.
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:17 PM Ari Chivukula <aric...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen the notes from the meeting (don't see them here:
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/tree/gh-pages/2022/telcons), do you
>> have a copy and/or can you describe the forward-compatible cases?
>>
>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:38 AM Chris Harrelson <chris...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ari,
>>>
>>> There were some questions on the TAG review about potential extensions
>>> to the syntax for additional use cases. Just checking: do you think the
>>> current design is forward-compatible with these use cases?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:39 AM Ari Chivukula <aric...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There was one comment on the TAG thread:
>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/765#issuecomment-1245616454
>>>>
>>>> Mozilla just published a positive position:
>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/679
>>>>
>>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:39 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We discussed this in the API OWNERS meeting today, and given that the
>>>>> TAG review issue was added to the TPAC milestone for next week, we'd like
>>>>> to wait a week or so to see if there is any useful feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/31/22 10:44 AM, Ari Chivukula wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll add a note, but this is actually deliberate.
>>>>>
>>>>> *.foo.com does not match foo.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 10:19 ayumi hamasaki <ayumih...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The example in the description is a bit confusing found here:
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170361717489664
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; "
>>>>>> https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";)
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With this feature, it could look like: permissions-policy:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com"; "https://*.foo.com";)
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One would think why not just write: `ch-ua-platform-version=(self "
>>>>>> https://*.foo.com";)` instead. As you're used `foo.com` twice!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it not be better to use `foo.com` and `example.com` instead
>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://example.com
>>>>>> <https://foo.com/>" "https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";)
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With this feature, it could look like: permissions-policy:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://example.com <https://foo.com/>
>>>>>> " "https://*.foo.com";)
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which would make more sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, 31 August 2022 at 15:10:31 UTC+1 ari...@chromium.org
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry about that:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/679
>>>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/51
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, 10:06 Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:27 PM Ari Chivukula <ari...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Contact emails
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ari...@chromium.org, mike...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Design Doc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HtkQivbjO6TiP6uZdTt4KmTnWzbs5IZpEdrz59-fyYU/edit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Specification
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/479
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This feature will add support for wildcard in permissions policy
>>>>>>>>> structured like SCHEME://*.HOST:PORT (e.g., https://*.foo.com/)
>>>>>>>>> where a valid Origin could be constructed from SCHEME://HOST:PORT 
>>>>>>>>> (e.g.,
>>>>>>>>> https://foo.com/). This requires that HOST is at least eTLD+1 (a
>>>>>>>>> registrable domain). This means that https://*.bar.foo.com/ works
>>>>>>>>> but https://*.com/ won’t (if you want to allow all domains to use
>>>>>>>>> the feature, you should just delegate to *). Wildcards in the scheme 
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> port section will be unsupported and https://*.foo.com/ does not
>>>>>>>>> delegate to https://foo.com/.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Before, a permissions policy might need to look like:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com";
>>>>>>>>> "https://cdn1.foo.com"; "https://cdn2.foo.com";)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With this feature, it could look like:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> permissions-policy: ch-ua-platform-version=(self "https://foo.com";
>>>>>>>>> "https://*.foo.com";)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Blink component
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Blink>PermissionsAPI
>>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPermissionsAPI>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Motivation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Permissions Policy specification
>>>>>>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-permissions-policy/> “defines a
>>>>>>>>> mechanism that allows developers to selectively enable and disable 
>>>>>>>>> use of
>>>>>>>>> various browser features and APIs.” One capability of this mechanism 
>>>>>>>>> allows
>>>>>>>>> features to be enabled only on explicitly enumerated origins (e.g.,
>>>>>>>>> https://foo.com/). This mechanism is not flexible enough for the
>>>>>>>>> design of some CDNs, which deliver content via an origin that might be
>>>>>>>>> hosted on one of several hundred possible subdomains.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TAG review
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/765
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Compatibility
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Depending on their user base, sites may want to entertain a
>>>>>>>>> transition period for older Chromium clients, where they enumerate all
>>>>>>>>> subdomains and include the wildcard in the permissions policy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Interoperability
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We would be the first to implement if approved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gecko: Will ask
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WebKit: Will ask
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Links to signal requests?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Web developers:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/479
>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure/issues/108>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Future work might flag syntax errors in the Issues tab
>>>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lDEvj8tMeuvUs1HTTqL-44YiI-7ljeQkusM_WhUfIeE/edit>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, but it will be.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://crbug.com/1345994
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170361717489664
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're)
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DLDbhOMWugyzXTKsvjH6koO8g7sV7eg_NQgq0GZeCOQ1A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DLDbhOMWugyzXTKsvjH6koO8g7sV7eg_NQgq0GZeCOQ1A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2BCusaFBxLhe930f_X%2BvisYes%3DQLOBB8VFevR804kcS_A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2BCusaFBxLhe930f_X%2BvisYes%3DQLOBB8VFevR804kcS_A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2Bqnrhs1j0YaFFHmJGCzzE2_YMW6yYe1QYX_PezNHWo2Q%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5D%2Bqnrhs1j0YaFFHmJGCzzE2_YMW6yYe1QYX_PezNHWo2Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DL%2BnwnbfHJe5gk86LPjWEK%2BrjA37Pyv6m43zA418a6LrA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DL%2BnwnbfHJe5gk86LPjWEK%2BrjA37Pyv6m43zA418a6LrA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGpy5DL-%2BBuNvSh46_qWHeCi%3DwY4f_%2BRzA4MN73sx9hp55qBLg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to