At 13:11 +0100 14/8/09, Antony Williams wrote:
>Cameron Neylon, Peter Murray-Rust and myself were at the Google Wave
>discussion at SciFoo. Cameron has an intention to use Google Wave to
>write an article and this may match with your intentions. I have cc'ed
>Cameron for his comments.
>
>Antony Williams, VP Strategic Development
>ChemSpider, Royal Society of Chemistry

Tony,

I presume since you are posting this information to the list, the knowledge of 
the above meeting is open and can be quoted as such?

If anyone is interested, this particular thread was catalysed at my end by a 
request from  Nature  Chemistry for myself (and independently a colleague)  to 
write a  News&View article for the journal. This takes as its starting point, a 
recently published, and possibly even controversial, regular article, and 
appends a view of it by one or more others. That view is of course static, and 
cannot be added to by anyone else (it is also limited to  1000 words, and odd 
limitation in this day and age?).  In this it is, it could be argued, a rather 
pale imitation of a  blog entry.  My article charted its own course (I do not 
think  I was in charge at all),  and  I ended up with what might be described 
as an  "exploratorium", this being of the chemistry and in particular of the 
molecules concerned.  But again, it is very much a write once/read many 
conventional construct.  The subsequent discussions with the editor of  Nature 
Chemistry had (and continue to have) a most interesting flavour. The outcome, 
whatever it becomes, is expected in October, or possibly November. 

I have mulled over whether my "commentary" (it evolved into this from an  
News&Views, and now allows  2000 words!) could indeed be cast as a Google wave, 
thus inviting others into the exploratorium. It also begs the question of 
whether a self-consistent analysis of some aspect of chemistry  should continue 
to mutate with time, or whether after a period of rapid mutation, it then 
becomes cast in stone.  Much of the social dynamics of a university department 
very much continues to depend on the later (tenure, promotion,  prizes, etc).
-- 

Professor Henry S Rzepa.
+44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ & /rzepa/blog
Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7  2AZ, UK.

(Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email.
If expected reply not received, please phone/fax).


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss

Reply via email to