The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 3 : Issue 409 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: M Coupes
  Re: M Coupes
  Re: M30 Idle Quality
  Re: M30 Idle Quality
  Re: M30 Idle Quality
  Re: M30 Idle Quality
  Re: M30 Idle Quality
  Re: M Coupes
  Re: M Coupes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:11:18 -0500
From: "Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: M Coupes
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

And I have to reply too.  The '99-'00 S52-engined Coupes are in B Stock. 
The '01-'02 S54 Coupes are in A Stock.  Of course I was referring to a 
street prepared car running against the 2006 National ASP winner.

Results of individual events which do list the drivers' cars are here:
http://solo.wdcr-scca.org/results/

And of course this has nothing to do with Alex's original post which was 
just seeking a price and the marketability of these cars.
Woody



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [UUC] M Coupes


> You knew I could not resist replying...  :^)
>
> At a National level, the car is in A Stock. That puts it up against the C4 
> Corvette, 2005+ Honda S2000, Porsche 993, Boxster S, and the Solstice GXP 
> (very fast car for no bucks).
> http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2006/stockm.html#BMW
> or to see what is in A Stock:
> http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2006/stockc.html
>
> At the regional level, like WDCR, it is competitive but not like the 
> previously mentioned cars (the results link you posted, unfortunately does 
> not list the cars, just the drivers).
>
> Going back into history:
> 2006:
> http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/File/Combined%20Nationals.pdf (no BMWs in 
> A Stock)
>
> 2005:
> http://www.scca.com/_Filelibrary/File/2005SoloNationals-FINALresults.pdf 
> (no BMWs in A Stock)
>
> 2004:
> http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/File/2004SoloNationalResults.pdf (Z4 cars 
> in B Stock)
>
> 2003:
> http://www.scca.com/_Filelibrary/File/2003SoloNationals.pdf
> Finally found a Coupe! But in 19th place.  :^(
>
> As I said, it is a shame that it doesn't seem as competitive as it should 
> be. Typical with BMWs, the OEM alignments and adjustments hamper the car 
> (this is for the "Stock" classes folks, so all the fun stuff that you 
> *could* do are not legal for SCCA). As I looked at the classing link, the 
> car that Alex has could be interesting in B Stock, but the front running 
> car there these days are the Mazda RX-8s. Once you swap the motor (factory 
> directive due to engine coking issues), the RX is very fast. Say Alex, 
> mind if I borrow that Coupe for 2007?  :^)
>
>
> Matt Murray
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Matt,
>> Not so great for SCCA autocrossing you say?  In the highly competitive DC 
>> Region, SCCA, Brian Hair and Jason Becker campaigned an S52-engined Coupe 
>> and gave national competitors Michael Johnson and Rod McGeorge (both 
>> Z06s) a good run for their money in the ASP class.  Yeah, the S54-engined 
>> cars (2001 and 2002) are faster at speeds above 60 mph.
>> see:  http://solo.wdcr-scca.org/results/2006Standings.php
>
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
> 



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:50:09 -0500
From: Matt Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: M Coupes
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Alex who?  :^)

Matt Murray

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> And of course this has nothing to do with Alex's original post which was 
> just seeking a price and the marketability of these cars.
> Woody

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:29:05 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: M30 Idle Quality
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Valve adjustment sensitivity, good engine ground and battery strap ground,
new distributor cap and rotor, new main relay, keep the throttle plate
clean, good temp sensors and the silver plugs. Every other plug I ever
tried was just not as good.

-Kevin



 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
 This  e-mail  communication is confidential and is intended only 
 for  the individual(s) or entity named above and others who have 
 been  specifically  authorized to receive it. If you are not the 
 intended  recipient,  please  do not read, copy, use or disclose 
 the  contents of this communication to others. Please notify the 
 sender  that  you have received this e-mail in error by replying 
 to  the e-mail.  Please then delete the e-mail and any copies of 
 it. Thank you.                                                   
 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 





------------------------------

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:22:11 -0500
From: "john grills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: M30 Idle Quality
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 
Norm Grills (no relation) of the Bix Six Group gave some tips on this that
worked well on my iX a while back. When I installed a DEC Cat and cone
intake, the M20 started idling rough (higher flow?) so I set the valves
towards the high end of spec (or higher, I forget). Same for the plug gap,
and this made everything good again. I ran it this way from 160k-256k miles
with no problems. Also, a good cleaning of the ICV never hurts.

Cheers!
John Grills
NCC-BMWCCA


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:30:17 -0600
From: "Robert Blakeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: M30 Idle Quality
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks for the responses, guys. I just had the head rebuilt on my 535 and 
really worked over the engine bay with all new rubber bits and sensors and 
it idles better than it ever has. No problems here today, but as the 
consensus seems to suggest, it's still an M30.

I was just curious about the idle quality in general, given that this was 
one of the issues that prompted BMW to develop the V8s as a replacement for 
the M30. Given their reputation for sweet running inline 6s, was the M30 
really a dead-end for them? Does anyone know if a VANOS unit was ever 
attempted on it to better control combustion?

Robert
1990 535i, 166k
2000 528i, 70k

_________________________________________________________________
Want a degree but can't afford to quit? Top school degrees online - in as 
fast as 1 year 
http://forms.nextag.com/goto.jsp?url=/serv/main/buyer/education.jsp?doSearch=n&tm=y&search=education_text_links_88_h288c&s=4079&p=5116


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:14:01 -0500
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Blakeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: M30 Idle Quality
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Vanos was only used on twin cam engines.  Changing the valve overlap is the 
main benefit of Vanos, something only possible with twin cams.

I think the V-8 was developed because the M30 ran out of displacement and 
power.  The M30 =>S38 development had run its course.

Gary Derian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Blakeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [UUC] M30 Idle Quality


> Thanks for the responses, guys. I just had the head rebuilt on my 535 and 
> really worked over the engine bay with all new rubber bits and sensors and 
> it idles better than it ever has. No problems here today, but as the 
> consensus seems to suggest, it's still an M30.
>
> I was just curious about the idle quality in general, given that this was 
> one of the issues that prompted BMW to develop the V8s as a replacement 
> for the M30. Given their reputation for sweet running inline 6s, was the 
> M30 really a dead-end for them? Does anyone know if a VANOS unit was ever 
> attempted on it to better control combustion?
>
> Robert
> 1990 535i, 166k
> 2000 528i, 70k
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Want a degree but can't afford to quit? Top school degrees online - in as 
> fast as 1 year 
> http://forms.nextag.com/goto.jsp?url=/serv/main/buyer/education.jsp?doSearch=n&tm=y&search=education_text_links_88_h288c&s=4079&p=5116
>
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com 


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:35:42 -0800
From: "JS Nord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: M30 Idle Quality
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Gary,

When you mentioned that the M30 idle issues are related to differences in 
cylinder pressure, what causes would attribute to that?  I can understand 
issues with fuel due to injector variances but are there inherent issues 
with the design that contribute to this - manifold, etc?

Jeff


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Blakeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [UUC] M30 Idle Quality


> Vanos was only used on twin cam engines.  Changing the valve overlap is 
> the main benefit of Vanos, something only possible with twin cams.
>
> I think the V-8 was developed because the M30 ran out of displacement and 
> power.  The M30 =>S38 development had run its course.
>
> Gary Derian
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert Blakeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [UUC] M30 Idle Quality
>
>
>> Thanks for the responses, guys. I just had the head rebuilt on my 535 and 
>> really worked over the engine bay with all new rubber bits and sensors 
>> and it idles better than it ever has. No problems here today, but as the 
>> consensus seems to suggest, it's still an M30.
>>
>> I was just curious about the idle quality in general, given that this was 
>> one of the issues that prompted BMW to develop the V8s as a replacement 
>> for the M30. Given their reputation for sweet running inline 6s, was the 
>> M30 really a dead-end for them? Does anyone know if a VANOS unit was ever 
>> attempted on it to better control combustion?
>>
>> Robert
>> 1990 535i, 166k
>> 2000 528i, 70k
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Want a degree but can't afford to quit? Top school degrees online - in as 
>> fast as 1 year 
>> http://forms.nextag.com/goto.jsp?url=/serv/main/buyer/education.jsp?doSearch=n&tm=y&search=education_text_links_88_h288c&s=4079&p=5116
>>
>> Search the 
>> ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>>
>> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
>> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
>> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
> 


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:24:03 -0500
From: Bill Weismann - MSR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alex Cagann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: M Coupes
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

List,

Before I get flamed, this is me speaking as a dealer.  I think that M 
Coupes are kickass little cars and my customers who have them love them.

Alex,

On a wholesale level, the car's worth, IMO, about $18k.  If it's like 
new it could do $20-21k at Manheim or FAAO or out in Cali, and it could 
also run 4 times and not sell.  They are rare cars that don't change 
hands very often and for something of a reason, they can grow hairs on 
your lot.  They are a lot like Imola Red E38s, 5-Speed E32s, 540i 
Tourings, etc..  really cool cars for people like us, but cars that 98% 
of BMW buyers won't consider buying.  They are rare for a reason, not 
too many people bought or wanted them when new, and as much as the 
owners of them now love em.  I checked MMR and I only found one that 
sold this year or towards the end of last.. a 73k miler in what was 
probably Estoril (Better color for a M Coupe than black IMO and In My 
Experience) that did $16,500.  Cali prices are, as you know, high.  I'd 
say the car does in the $19s at the right auction, maybe low 20s on eBay 
after listing it a few times.

If it were me, I'd find a home for it before I took it in.  A friend of 
mine deals in primarially M cars down in Miami, his eBay id is 
"inmotive" and you might want to contact him for a buy figure.

Sounds like a beaut but they can be a pain to sell.  You're right to be 
careful. 

Bill

Alex Cagann wrote:
> Need an opinion from this list. I am reticent to put a hard value on this
> car...it is being traded in to me on a 2000 M5 I have for sale. I have never
> bought one, barely ever seen one on the road, and just want to be safe...and
> frankly, I never hear these discussed on this list. Car is the following:
>
> 1999 M Coupe
> 30k miles
> Black on black with all options
>
> How do I evaluate this car?  There are two on ebay, but I don't trust ebay
> for crap. I could probably put a number on it, but will I sell it?  I just
> don't see them changing hands very often.  I just don't see the demand for
> this car. Definitely sounds like a fun car to have around for a bit, but I
> do this for a living and don't want to take on something that will take
> months to move. 
>
> Alex
>   


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:55:36 -0500
From: Matt Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: M Coupes
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I would do WDCR events if it wasn't for the five hour geographics involved. 
:^(  With Nassau Coliseum at 55 minutes away, I go to those more often. My 
priorities are with the New England Region of SCCA, where there is a 
definite lack of Z3 M Coupes.

Matt Murray

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I only plan to autcross my M Coupe in local BMW and other organization 
> events.  The WDCR events really are a big deal here (250+ entrants) and 
> I'll be co-driving a supercharged M Coupe in SM2 this year.
>
> Woody 


------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(9 messages)
**********

Reply via email to