The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 3 : Issue 455 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: [e36] Battery vent
  CarFax request
  Re: E32/E34 Xenon headlights - Factory
  E36 windoze
  Re: [e36] Battery vent
  Re: [e36] Battery vent
  Re: [e36] Battery vent
  Re: [e36] Battery vent
  Re: [e36] Battery vent
  Re: CarFax request illegal?
  Re: CarFax request illegal?
  Re: CarFax request illegal?
  92 318 FS (WOB )

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:54:06 -0700
From: "Curtis Ingraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [e36] Battery vent
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I did the same on Lisa's '92 318is a few years back.  The vent tube
goes through a grommet near the front edge of the battery box floor.
You can see the bottom of the grommet under the car, and it's easy to
see inside with the battery removed.

Curt Ingraham
Oakland, CA

> Any have a pic, or can tell me where the battery vent tubing on an e36
> 318is goes? It was missing when I bought the car. I bought new tubing
> from BMW but don't know where it vents to. Nothing in the ETK to give
> me an indication either.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim Laing
> Evo Clown
>
> I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence - Ayrton Senna

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:37:30 +0000
From: "Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: CarFax request
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If someone has a current CarFax account could they run WBADP5344YBR95548 for 
me please?

TIA,
Evan

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:54:30 -0400
From: Felix Vicente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: KMS- Brett Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        UUC Digest <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: E32/E34 Xenon headlights - Factory
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> FYI, on the bay.  Not mine, but I've know the seller and have seen the
> lights.  They are in great shape.  I think he'd be open to offers.
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/yroxwo

be advised that the wiring harness is different than the halogens and newer
xenons (ie you can't just plug the 9005/6 harness into them) and I have yet
to figure out which of the 4 wires are which. The bulb is a different kind
too, so you can't just yank the old transformer and put in a newer one with
the matching new bulb.

-felix
miami,fl
01 540/6 came with xenons
98 740 halogens
95 525 with a set of e32 xenons waiting for me to figure that wiring out


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:05:56 -0400
From: "Fuerst Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "UUC Digest" <[email protected]>
Subject: E36 windoze
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Well KK must have jinxed me since the sons windows all broke Saturday
and mine
only goes up and down a 1/2" at a time since Friday.

I traced the 4 door window problem to one of the 3 connectors coming out
of the harness
in conjunction the window came off the track leading to one of the leads
ripping/shorting and taking out
The 5A central locking fuse. That took some headscratches and JFGI on
Sunday morning since the
10A window fuse was OK. I am also in the middle of repairing the door
skin whilst out of the car.
I am going to ziptie the door plugs into the holster. I also flipped the
plastic sliders that ride on the
arms in the AL channels and cleaned out the old oxidation while I was in
there. I also had to bend
Back the front part of the regulator arm. Quite easy to do with a small
pipe wrench.

On the 2 door I believe the article I saw while looking for the fuse
problem is that there is a magnet
on the window motor shaft that moves?

http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=238468

Looks like I have to remove a cover and slide the magnet?
Not really sure how the magnet works. Does anyone know?

My sunroof panel comes off the track when using the sliding feature.
I'll have to get that fixed. Luckily I could get it closed again. The
tilt feature works fine.
I'll have to do some homework on the sunroof cassette before I get into
that. It seems
a bit more complex than the e30 roofs.

Also, My RF caliper (or hose) is hanging on long drives. It's OK back
and forth to werk, about 10 minutes
(Doesn't get all hot and grabby) I think I'll R&R the caliper and if it
looks OK, change the hose.

Thanks,
1st


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:33:37 -0400
From: "Fuerst Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [e36] Battery vent
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 
http://www.ninemisfit.com/vehicles/1996_bmw_m3/optima/empty_battery_well
.jpg


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Houser

I don't have a pic, nor an E36 anymore, but on my E34 the tube runs down
through a hole in the floor, which I assume gets vented to the outside
somehow.

--
Brad Houser


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:47:37 -0700
From: Peter Loron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Fuerst Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [e36] Battery vent
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I just went through this on my E36. As you can see in the pic, the 
grommet with the hole in it is towards the front of the battery well. 
What I wound up doing (with an Interstate MTP-91 battery) was running 
the drain tube down through one of the holes in the plate at the rear of 
the compartment, along that channel, and then out the grommet.

There didn't appear to be another way to route the tube under the 
battery that wouldn't pinch the tube shut.

-Pete

Fuerst Chris wrote:
>  
> http://www.ninemisfit.com/vehicles/1996_bmw_m3/optima/empty_battery_well
> .jpg
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Houser
> 
> I don't have a pic, nor an E36 anymore, but on my E34 the tube runs down
> through a hole in the floor, which I assume gets vented to the outside
> somehow.
> 
> --
> Brad Houser
> 
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
> 
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:24 -0700
From: Rex Tener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Fuerst Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rex Tener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [e36] Battery vent
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 09:47 AM 4/23/2007, Peter Loron wrote:
>I just went through this on my E36. As you can see in the pic, the 
>grommet with the hole in it is towards the front of the battery 
>well. What I wound up doing (with an Interstate MTP-91 battery) was 
>running the drain tube down through one of the holes in the plate at 
>the rear of the compartment, along that channel, and then out the grommet.
>
>Fuerst Chris wrote:
>>
>>http://www.ninemisfit.com/vehicles/1996_bmw_m3/optima/empty_battery_well.jpg

I took that picture of my M3 #2.  :-)  However, that is the wrong 
place for the vent.  On my recently purchased M3 #3, the dealer had 
put a new battery in before purchase and used that grommet.  The 
correct place is at the front of the battery well and then to the 
left.  Unfortunately, it is just out of view in this picture.

Rex


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:21:53 -0700
From: Peter Loron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rex Tener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected], Fuerst Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [e36] Battery vent
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Rex Tener wrote:
> At 09:47 AM 4/23/2007, Peter Loron wrote:
>> I just went through this on my E36. As you can see in the pic, the 
>> grommet with the hole in it is towards the front of the battery well. 
>> What I wound up doing (with an Interstate MTP-91 battery) was running 
>> the drain tube down through one of the holes in the plate at the rear 
>> of the compartment, along that channel, and then out the grommet.
>>
>> Fuerst Chris wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.ninemisfit.com/vehicles/1996_bmw_m3/optima/empty_battery_well.jpg
>>>  
>>>
> 
> I took that picture of my M3 #2.  :-)  However, that is the wrong place 
> for the vent.  On my recently purchased M3 #3, the dealer had put a new 
> battery in before purchase and used that grommet.  The correct place is 
> at the front of the battery well and then to the left.  Unfortunately, 
> it is just out of view in this picture.
> 
> Rex
> 

Ah! So the correct location is the front driver's side corner of the 
floor of the well? Interesting...I don't recall seeing a grommet there...

Yeah the lack of obvious place to route the vent tube under the battery 
seemed un-BMW.

-Pete

-Pete

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:37:25 -0400
From: "marshall lytle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Peter Loron'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "'Fuerst Chris'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [e36] Battery vent
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The mtp-91 comes with a vent extension hose kit to run the side vent on the
mtp-91 around to the std grommet hole in the floor by the forward left
corner of the batter.  The extension is long enough to run around the front
of the battery.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Loron
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 12:48 PM
To: Fuerst Chris
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UUC] [e36] Battery vent

I just went through this on my E36. As you can see in the pic, the grommet
with the hole in it is towards the front of the battery well. 
What I wound up doing (with an Interstate MTP-91 battery) was running the
drain tube down through one of the holes in the plate at the rear of the
compartment, along that channel, and then out the grommet.

There didn't appear to be another way to route the tube under the battery
that wouldn't pinch the tube shut.

-Pete

Fuerst Chris wrote:
>  
> http://www.ninemisfit.com/vehicles/1996_bmw_m3/optima/empty_battery_we
> ll
> .jpg
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Houser
> 
> I don't have a pic, nor an E36 anymore, but on my E34 the tube runs 
> down through a hole in the floor, which I assume gets vented to the 
> outside somehow.
> 
> --
> Brad Houser
> 
> Search the 
> ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the 
> BMW CCA.
> 
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate 
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short
Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:35:02 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: CarFax request illegal?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hello, it appears to be illegal to "run a VIN for someone " if you have 
not paid for the privilege of using the CarFax service. Please respect 
the terms and conditions of your CarFax account; they ask that you pay for 
an account and run it for yourself, understandably giving them a return on 
their investment that includes profit. As an inventor, I respect the concept 
of Return On Investment.

I am thinking of the integrity of the UUC site, and of the possible damage to 
UUC's reputation if this kind of abuse is reported or discovered by CarFax.

Just my $.02 worth.

Thanks, Andy
"Mister Fixit", Colorado
1972 2002; 1986 535i
Inventions: E28 Rear Lighting Safety Upgrades (various configurations)
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If someone has a current CarFax account could they run WBADP5344YBR95548 for 
> me please?
> 
> TIA,
> Evan
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> 
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
> 
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:28:28 -0500
From: "Dennis Wynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: CarFax request illegal?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To me it is more question of common sense.  If you are looking to
spend any money at all on a used car, why not spend the $25 they ask
for an unlimited account?  I am cheapskate myself, but when I shop for
a used car I buy an account rather than beg for freebies.

BTW, in an informal comparison I did last year between CarFax and
AutoCheck - AutoCheck was the same on some VINs, better on some, worse
on a few. The unlimited AutoCheck is good for 60 days compared to 30
for CarFax and you can get money back on your purchase from various
discount/coupon web sits (FatWallet give your back 10% if you buy
through their link, for example).

So next time, I will get the 60 day unlimited AutoCheck account and
see how it goes.

Also, you always get the car inspected before purchase by someone that
knows what they are doing - no matter what CarFax or AutoCheck say :-)

Dennis

On 4/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, it appears to be illegal to "run a VIN for someone " if you have
> not paid for the privilege of using the CarFax service. Please respect
> the terms and conditions of your CarFax account; they ask that you pay for
> an account and run it for yourself, understandably giving them a return on
> their investment that includes profit. As an inventor, I respect the concept
> of Return On Investment.
>
> I am thinking of the integrity of the UUC site, and of the possible damage to
> UUC's reputation if this kind of abuse is reported or discovered by CarFax.
>
> Just my $.02 worth.
>
> Thanks, Andy
> "Mister Fixit", Colorado
> 1972 2002; 1986 535i
> Inventions: E28 Rear Lighting Safety Upgrades (various configurations)
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > If someone has a current CarFax account could they run WBADP5344YBR95548 for
> > me please?
> >
> > TIA,
> > Evan
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> > Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
> >
> > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> > Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> > 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:49:25 -0400
From: Martin Bullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Uucdigest Digest <[email protected]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Evan A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Dennis Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CarFax request illegal?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For another perspective, I believe there's also a situation rather  
like the record industry's numbers about loss of revenue from file  
sharing, etc.  I believe, albeit anecdotally, that there's a lot of  
shared music out there that would never be bought if money had to  
change hands.  To count this as lost sales is disingenuous, and  
probably fails to account for the business gained from consumers who  
download shared music then pay for legal versions because they like  
what they hear.

I suspect something of this is true about Carfax-type records, too.   
I know of situations where Carfax-type reports have been run after  
the fact for a variety of reasons:  As a reassurance, because the  
requester is anal-retentive (should I use a hyphen?), or maybe  
because they know something happened to a car, and they're using that  
event and information to validate to worth of running a Carfax in the  
future.  Would these people have purchased an account?  I doubt it.   
Did  they benefit from it?  Marginally, if at all.

I get involved in the whole intellectual property issue quite often  
(lots of business in China), and I have strict personal rules about  
not buying bootleg DVD's and so on, but I think the waters are a  
little more grey here than they might be painted.

My $.02; YMMV, etc.

Martin Bullen
'95 M3
'97 Z3 2.8 (finally with the hardtop removed this weekend!)
'01 740i Sport

On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Dennis Wynne wrote:

> To me it is more question of common sense.  If you are looking to
> spend any money at all on a used car, why not spend the $25 they ask
> for an unlimited account?  I am cheapskate myself, but when I shop for
> a used car I buy an account rather than beg for freebies.
>
> BTW, in an informal comparison I did last year between CarFax and
> AutoCheck - AutoCheck was the same on some VINs, better on some, worse
> on a few. The unlimited AutoCheck is good for 60 days compared to 30
> for CarFax and you can get money back on your purchase from various
> discount/coupon web sits (FatWallet give your back 10% if you buy
> through their link, for example).
>
> So next time, I will get the 60 day unlimited AutoCheck account and
> see how it goes.
>
> Also, you always get the car inspected before purchase by someone that
> knows what they are doing - no matter what CarFax or AutoCheck say :-)
>
> Dennis
>
> On 4/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, it appears to be illegal to "run a VIN for someone " if you  
>> have
>> not paid for the privilege of using the CarFax service. Please  
>> respect
>> the terms and conditions of your CarFax account; they ask that you  
>> pay for
>> an account and run it for yourself, understandably giving them a  
>> return on
>> their investment that includes profit. As an inventor, I respect  
>> the concept
>> of Return On Investment.
>>
>> I am thinking of the integrity of the UUC site, and of the  
>> possible damage to
>> UUC's reputation if this kind of abuse is reported or discovered  
>> by CarFax.
>>
>> Just my $.02 worth.
>>
>> Thanks, Andy
>> "Mister Fixit", Colorado
>> 1972 2002; 1986 535i
>> Inventions: E28 Rear Lighting Safety Upgrades (various  
>> configurations)
>>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>> From: "Evan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > If someone has a current CarFax account could they run  
>> WBADP5344YBR95548 for
>> > me please?
>> >
>> > TIA,
>> > Evan
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today  
>> it's FREE!
>> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>> >
>> > Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
>> [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>> >  
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> _____
>> > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the  
>> BMW CCA.
>> >
>> > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the  
>> Ultimate
>> > Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
>> > 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>>
>> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> _____
>> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the  
>> BMW CCA.
>>
>> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
>> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
>> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>>
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
> [email protected]
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ____
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the  
> BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:08:27 -0500
From: "Bill Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Senior Digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Steve Dunnavant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Jacob Dunnavant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 92 318 FS (WOB )
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Several folks have commented about how great a commuter these 318s are , so 
here's one for sale locally to me in mid-south Tenn ....$1500
I DONT know anything about it .......ask HIM not me ...
http://www.wksr.com/wksr.php?rfc=src/swapitem.php&id=97831

Beepee 


------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(13 messages)
**********

Reply via email to