----- Original Message -----
From: "Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: What do you mean Dutch intolerance?


> Dan Minette schreef:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:51 PM
> > Subject: What do you mean Dutch intolerance?
> >
> > OK, let me ask a couple of questions then. Maybe there are aspects of
the
> > Dutch culture that I don't understand.
> >
> > The Netherlands is about 8% ethnic Turks by population.
> >
> > What fraction of them are citizens?
>
> Most. Or at least their children are. Most of the immigrants' children
that are
> born here got the Dutch nationality by default at birth. (which btw
doesn't give
> them *all* that much more rights.) They also have the choice to keep the
> nationality of their parents as well. So nearly all Turkish, Moroccan,
German,
> Indian (or whatever other nationality) people's children, born in the
> Netherlands have a double nationality. Even my son has a double
nationality. But
> nobody really cares about what nationality you have. It's not a subject or
an
> issue for most Dutch.

Well, it appears that the Dutch do better than most of their neighbors.  For
example, Germans have third generation foreigners in their country who do
not qualify for citizenship because citizenship is a function of ancestry,
not residency.  As you said

> That terrible distinction you keep making again and again between
Hispanic - not
> Hispanic or black - not black doesn't exist here. Here you are either good
at
> what you do or you are not. You are likable or you are not. That's it.
That
> seems to be a concept that is really hard to grasp for you Dan.

And, it just so happens that the ethnic minorities are all just bad at
things?  Lets look at job numbers per ethnic group from:

http://www.pscw.uva.nl/imes/stats.htm#political

Ethnic group
                          Basic    Lower   Average   Higher Scholarly
Turks                   28          46        19             6            1
Moroccans           33         42         19             5            1
Surinamese           14         36         33           12            4
Antilleans              12         34         34           14            7
Dutch                     6          27        33            24            9

Every indication shows that this is a ethnic breakdown, not a breakdown of
nationalities.  One sees that ethnic minorities, for the most part, do the
bottom of the barrel work.  While, for brand new immigrants, this is not
surprising, other sources from the Netherlands indicate that problems
continue to exist in the second generation.

One way of looking at this is to consider the unemployment rate for young
people (15-25).  They would be more likely to be second generation, and less
likely to be able to immigrate without a job, or to have come and then loose
their job.  One finds an unemployment rate of 23% for ethnic Turks and 31%
for ethnic Moroccans, and 11% for ethnic Dutch.

Let me quote from the Dutch report on minorities available at:

http://www.scp.nl/boeken/cahiers/cah142/uk/persbericht.htm

The number of young people from minorities in work has increased in recent
years from 27,000 in 1987-1989 to 33,000 in 1993-1995. Nevertheless their
prospects in the labor market are substantially poorer than those of
indigenous young people. Had their employment opportunities been equal, over
60,000 rather than 33,000 would have been in employment in 1993-1995.

Y'all don't have a problem?  Look, we've got a problem too, but we don't put
our heads in the sand.

Why do these differences exist.
You are saying
> that America is better because such and such a percentage of another group
than
> white American males is in office. You have no idea how terrible that kind
of
> argument sounds for people used to the amount of tolerance we have in the
> Netherlands.
>

Lets look at that tolerance.  Unfortunately, I do not have figures for the
Netherlands by themselves, but I have European figures.  Only about 27%
think that non-Europeans should have the same privileges as Europeans.
More, (about 29%) think they should all be sent home.  Only 16% consider
them full members of society.

It is noted that the Netherlands opinions are more tolerant than average,
but I would be shocked if the Netherlands had 70% that considered these
workers full members of society.


>
> I wouldn't know. Because in the Netherlands it really doesn't matter. It
is not
> important weather your origins are Afro American, Russian, Asian,
Moroccan,
> Turkish or whatever. It does however seem to matter a *lot* to you that
you can
> _specifically_ mention one Hispanic and one black citizen that are
successful in
> office. Now that _does_ show something about difference in mentality I'd
say.
>

Actually, I was talking about Houston, which is the local big city.  The
fact that you cannot name a single ethnic minority  is indicative to me.  I
would have guessed, since ethnic minorities are identifiable, that you could
have gone through a list in your head and come up with a few.



>Oh and btw since you claimed that Jewish people have to be afraid in the
Netherlands I think it is your
>turn now to prove it. Or do you retract?

I didn't say they had to be, I said they were.  That is a fact, I was told
it.  The present fraction of the world Jewish population that is afraid to
move to Europe is not established. FWIW, I will expand my questioning to see
if this report is non-representative.

But, let me go back to the statistics again.  One needs to understand how
risky going to Israel was in the late 40s.  The consensus opinion at the
time was that the Jewish settlers didn't have a chance against the Arab
armies.  Not only were they outnumbered (> a factor of 10), but they were
not as well equipped.  The Arabs had planes from the British, IIRC, and
Israel had to find a way to buy a few planes from Checkslovakia.

The fact that over half of the Jewish people remaining went to a place where
a reasonable person would have to conclude that there was a high chance of
death should indicate something about their feeling of safety.  The fact
that the population in the United States increased over the same time period
should indicate the relative feeling of safety in the US.

I'm not trying to argue that the Netherlands is some evil place where
non-Europeans are treated like cattle.  However, it strains credibility to
think that anti-Semitism that prevailed for at least a thousand years and
which provided the basis for the Holocaust evaporated since WWII.  The fact
that the reports y'all read indicating that the Jewish people are mostly at
fault for the strife in the Middle East, that nothing sympathetic to their
plight gets published blows my mind.

Generalize it.  Take an ethnic minority that has lost 1/3rd of their
worldwide population and 2/3rds of their population in a region.  Most of
them decide not to stay in the countries where they were murdered.  Their
ability to move to a safer country is limited.  But, there seems to be a
chance for them to establish their own country where they can defend
themselves.  Are they evil to jump at the chance?  Are they at fault?

Then, they were attacked immediately, and often by superior forces.  The
leaders around them proclaimed that they would be destroyed.  Now,
considering what had just happened to them, would it be paranoid for them to
take those leaders at their words?  The second time they were attacked, they
gained a great deal of territory, but were forced to give it back and to
retreat into boundaries that are absurdly hard to destroy.  The third time,
they kept the land as a buffer.  The fourth time, they barely survived, even
with the buffer.

And, as Jerone states, there is nothing good to be said in the local press
about these people?  That its all their fault.  And, said press are in the
same countries where they were slaughtered.  And, I'm crazy to think that
there is lingering prejudice against them?

Look, y'all aren't evil because there is still prejudice in Europe.  We
aren't evil because there is still prejudice in the US.  But, prejudice is
an evil, and we need to fight it.  It is hard, because it is so hard to
detect in ourselves.

Let me make a suggestion.  Talk you your friends who are ethnic minorites.
Find a way to make it safe for them to answer the question of whether they
feel that there is any discrimination against them at all.  The results
might surprise you.

Dan M.

Reply via email to