I'm not sure I got this one right, Julia.
But to cover my butt completely I must point out that the "I thought this
guy was crazy!"-remark wasn't supposed to offend - it was meant in a good
way. I probably left out the positive-vibe-smiley. However in these times I
can't blame you if you misunderstood me.
No matter what I won't take part in verbal mud-slugging - so of course I
wouldn't want to start one either. (I just love this mailing list - when the
listers are in a good mood).
Now having made my point pretty clear, I regret to inform you that although
there is nothing like a good rebus to stimulate the mind, I simply don't
have the routine to decipher that sort of English.

Med venlig hilsen / Yours sincerely
M. Malmkvist / WWW.PowerCad.dk

- You can't say civilization don't advance... For in every war they kill you
in a new way.
Will Rogers, The Autography of Will Rogers

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pa vegne
af Julia Thompson
Sendt: 12. juli 2002 19:55
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: (~) Please.


"M. Malmkvist" wrote:
>
> Well, then please give us mortals a clue. I thought this guy was crazy!
>

I'd've posted a translation this morning, but I was beaten to it by
David.  I think Reggie gave a good detailed explanation; if you still
have questions after Reggie's post, ask, and one (or maybe more) of us
will be happy to explain.  (I will, if no one else beats me to it.)

Asking for a clarification is usually welcome.  (And quite often, there
will be someone just itching to respond if the question is asked.)
Being dismissive when you don't understand something isn't as pleasant.

And if Erik is crazy, it might be along the lines of "crazy like a fox"
(or should that be "crazy as a fox"?  I can't remember now), which I'm
not sure I can explain very well right now, but I'm sure that someone
else could.

(I have asked Mark off-list to explain something in one of his rambling
posts, and he was quite nice to me in his response, and clarified the
bit I didn't get.)

        Julia

Reply via email to