> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mccmedia.com]On > Behalf Of Dan Minette
... > I think that is reasonable. But, I've got a neat, IMHO, > variation on that. > If person A dings person B, who dings back, person A should be > free to ding > again. But, then person B would also be free to ding back. The question > is whether we will have two antagonists who act like dingbats by dinging > back and forth. Wouldn't that make them dingbacks, rather than dingbats? Nick _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
