On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:18:16PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote: > non-anonymous ding = 0.1 ding (because it *should* cost you to ding > someone) > anonymous ding = 0.3 ding (because it should cost you more to be > anonymous) > > (This is somewhat proctonumerological. Take with as much salt as you > deem necessary.)
procto-salt snorting? Anyway, in the same anu...vein, I will say that those numbers are MUCH too low. It shouldn't be cheap to impose your opinion on others, and it should be VERY expensive to impose it anonymously. When there is no judge or jury, the sacrifice made by the vigilante should be AT LEAST as much as the punishment suffered by the "misbehaver". So, if dinging must be implemented (which I'm not sure is a good idea but if people want to try it), I suggest: transparent ding = 2 dings anonymous ding = 10 dings -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
