>> The difference between now and WWII is that such
>> people would not be
>> allowed to commit similar errors 12 years later,
>> like...... attacking in
>> 180 degrees the wrong direction.
>John -
>
>When I see something in quotes, I expect it to be
>*exactly* what the person said/wrote; if words are
>left out, I expect to see '<snip>' or '...' (as you
>did above: <<...similar errors 12 years later,
>> like...... attacking in
>> 180 degrees the wrong direction>> )
>
>If a summary or extrapolation is being made, then the
>words should be in ' 's instead of " "s; or else they
>should be preceded or followed by <<It seems to me>>
>or <<one surmises>> etc.
>
>Combining words without showing that there was a
>discontinuity is like combining 2 pictures without
>stating "Edited for composition" or something to that
>effect.
>
>Debbi
Huh?
The only words I dropped were in a non-essential dependent clause, and I
clearly indicated the snippage through the use of the ellipse. My
understanding is that use of the "ellipse" (i.e. the "...") I made above is
kosher enough to be used in the NY Times Style Handbook.
I must honestly say that I have no idea what you are complaining about.
JDG
_______________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world,
it is God's gift to humanity." - George W. Bush 1/29/03
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
