--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Deborah Harrell wrote: > > > Debbi > > who notes that I apparently replied to JDG's post > > before it was sent! What's up with the weird time > stamps? > > Um, I show his post as being timestamped 19:02:55 > -0500, or 00:02:55 GMT > the next day; I show yours as being timestamped > 18:48:14 -0800 or 02:48:14 > GMT the next day. > > 00:02:55 GMT is before 02:48:14 GMT.
Ah, sorry I wasn't clear - I meant the timestamps (from the archives, actually): >>On Wed Apr 2 23:55:48 PST 2003, you [John] wrote:<< >>In my [Debbi] post of Wed Apr 2 22:35:51 PST 2003<< which, unless I'm missing something (entirely possible), means that I replied before he posted! But that goes along with my frequently getting posts in topsy-turviness: I've read replies to you or Dan or several others, when the "original" post shows up later in the list. I even get new posts appearing *after* I've read that sequence. Maybe that's part of the "evil Yahoo" folks have been complaining about? :) Debbi who would prefer to have some control over time slippage if it's going to occur around me! __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
