Deborah Harrell wrote:
>
> --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >
> > > Debbi
> > > who notes that I apparently replied to JDG's post
> > > before it was sent! What's up with the weird time
> > stamps?
> >
> > Um, I show his post as being timestamped 19:02:55
> > -0500, or 00:02:55 GMT
> > the next day; I show yours as being timestamped
> > 18:48:14 -0800 or 02:48:14
> > GMT the next day.
> >
> > 00:02:55 GMT is before 02:48:14 GMT.
>
> Ah, sorry I wasn't clear - I meant the timestamps
> (from the archives, actually):
>
> >>On Wed Apr 2 23:55:48 PST 2003, you [John] wrote:<<
>
> >>In my [Debbi] post of Wed Apr 2 22:35:51 PST 2003<<
>
> which, unless I'm missing something (entirely
> possible), means that I replied before he posted!
Hm. I'm wondering if the archiving stuff isn't converting the timezone
info properly. Nick?
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
