JDG
> O.k., so "balance" as accusing the Republicans of
> haivng accomplished not
> one meaningful thing during the 20th Century, and of
> claiming that the
> Democrats have been responsible for essentially
> every positive American
> development during the 20th Century?

No, it consists of CHALLENGING  guys like you to come
up with ONE great accomplishment of Post WWI whose
intellectual roots lie within the GOP.  You have all
failed this challenge.  From civil rights to the
environment to space to containing communism to
opposing fascism to workers' rights to social security
to the sassy, karate-chopping girls we're now
raising... NONE of those are rooted in your party.

At the MIDDLE or tactical level, there are a few
exceptions (hear the balance?)  Reagan's brute force
Sumo confrontation with the USSR - while risky to the
point of lunacy - did indeed work.  It shattered the
brittle empire and he deserves credit for pushing the
end game of George Marshall's great plan.

And Nixon to China was a brilliant stroke.  If Condi
Rice had done the same as Kissinger and sent W to
Tehran, the Middle East would be transformed.  We'd
have eliminated the Ayatollahs AND Saddam AND the
Riyadh threat at a stroke.

If she had done that, I would have eagerly & quickly
given full points.  That's balance.

Which you will never show, even though the Balkans War
was a PERFECT success story in every way, the ideal
example of how 21st Century Pax Americana SHOULD pull
its weight around for the good of civilization.  The
opposite in every way to the maniacal stupidity of the
present bloody quagmire.

Oh, and AFGHANISTAN!  If you were balanced you'd give
EQUAL credit to W and to Clinton, since Bush had the
balls to say "Go!" ....

... But the war plan was utterly and completely
Clinton's already in place and ready to go.  This
undisputable fact would be open knowledge if it
weren't desperately urgent for the monsters to
suppress it.

Feh.

I'm balanced & I got nothin' to prove to you.

> 
> Sure, you gave a speech to the Libertarians once -
> but that hardly implies
> a balanced viewpoint between 
> Republicans and Democrats.   It merely means that
> you a Libertarian-leaning
> Democrat.   And sure, you admire one Republican from
> the 1960's, and one
> Republican from today.   That is like Rush Limbaugh
> saying that he is
> "balanced" because he admires John F. Kennedy's
> calls for tax cuts to
> revive the economy, and because he admires Joe
> Leiberman's aggressive
> stance in the War on Terror.   To me, at least, that
> is a pretty shaky
> foundation on which to build the claim of "balance."
> 
> Again, I propose a simple test - let us judge your
> balance by your own
> recorded statements on this List.   Let us examine
> your statements on
> Republicans and Democrats, assess them as either
> "postive" or "negative",
> and then see if there is any "balance" in the final
> tally.
> 
> Do you seriously wish to doubt the results?  
> Alternatively, if you do not
> wish to doubt the resutls, do you wish to seriously
> argue as to why the
> test is flawed - and why your remarks to this List
> are not an accurate
> measure of your "balance"?
> 
> Quite simply, Dr. Brin, I am honest enough to admit
> that I agree with
> President Bush on most things.   It seems to me that
> you agree with
> President Clinton on most things.   In fact, you
> statements seem to
> strongly reflect the positions of a Bill
> Clinton/Tony Blair "New Democrat."
>   I don't know why you see the need to hold to this
> fiction that you are
> somehow "balanced" between Democrats and
> Republicans, despite the evidence
> of your proceedings on this List - when you have
> nary a positive word to
> say about Republicans, and indeed regularly spew
> overheated vitriol against
> the Republicans.
> 
> JDG
> 
>
_______________________________________________________
> John D. Giorgis               -                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                "The liberty we prize is not
> America's gift to the world, 
>                it is God's gift to humanity." -
> George W. Bush 1/29/03
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> 

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to