Hi, > see the proof, please visit the wiki docs at > http://ciclone.mfh.it/care2002/documentation/ and see how many (or how > little) from the group had added to the docs. A new tech innovation might be > "better" when viewed from a techical vantage point. But when we add the human > factor and mass psychology to the equation, the results are often different.
Another view: you are right. but with the wiki there is some problem. The instalation and the server was: 1. administrated and set up unsecure. i didn't checked it again the last months. no reaction from the admin there. 2. a given copyright for the content was deleted. The given up copyright was gnu fdl copyright. In this special gnu-fdl debian friends have enormous problems. Ok it was given up to a non copyright version. no creative commons what is legalized and clear. > > Another thing, back in 2003, Lopo installed a groupware for a well intended > automated coordination of the project. Nobody used it except me and Lopo, > until it was forgotten and finally discarded. The only surviving systems from > Lopos work are the forum, faq, and bugtracker but they are also rarely used. Dead links everywhere at the care2x.com. How to use a groupware if the most people, get not the information? OTRS was used, but i had only the chance to forward them to the mailing list. See it in that way the point of discussion don't need any action at the moment but the signs go very straight into a direction that long time readers apply for some changes inside care2x developement. Hmmm Wilfried
