How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would use it. Also +1 on calling new version v2.1
Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of DynamicProxy2.dll Krzysztof Jonathon Rossi pisze: > 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion. > > So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2? > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > I'd vote for 2.1 > 2.0 is very stable. > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, > should we call > > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1? > > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> > >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-) > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what > version > >> > all > >> > the different projects were at with RC3. > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking > into 2.1 or > >> >> 2.0.1 > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open > issues from > >> >> > donjon > >> >> > for DynamicProxy: > >> >> > http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy > >> >> > > >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues > anymore, so we > >> >> > need > >> >> > to > >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make > changes to > >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore. > >> >> > > >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to > DynamicProxy 2.x > >> >> > to > >> >> > be > >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0? > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Jonathon Rossi > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> hammett > >> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jonathon Rossi > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> hammett > >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jonathon Rossi > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > > > -- > Jonathon Rossi > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
