I'm not direct DynamicProxy, only using it remotely through MK interceptors and NH proxies.
However one thing I find lacking is the ability to proxy a type for a specific interface when the type has an explicit interface implementation (aka private members). I don't know if it's a concern to anyone but me. On Nov 2, 8:17 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I > think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would > use it. > Also +1 on calling new version v2.1 > > Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle > project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of > DynamicProxy2.dll > Krzysztof > > Jonathon Rossi pisze: > > > 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion. > > > So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2? > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > I'd vote for 2.1 > > 2.0 is very stable. > > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, > > should we call > > > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1? > > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-) > > > >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what > > version > > >> > all > > >> > the different projects were at with RC3. > > > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking > > into 2.1 or > > >> >> 2.0.1 > > > >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open > > issues from > > >> >> > donjon > > >> >> > for DynamicProxy: > > >> >> >http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy > > > >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues > > anymore, so we > > >> >> > need > > >> >> > to > > >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make > > changes to > > >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore. > > > >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to > > DynamicProxy 2.x > > >> >> > to > > >> >> > be > > >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0? > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > Jonathon Rossi > > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Cheers, > > >> >> hammett > > >> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > >> > -- > > >> > Jonathon Rossi > > > >> -- > > >> Cheers, > > >> hammett > > >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > -- > > > Jonathon Rossi > > > -- > > Cheers, > > hammett > > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > -- > > Jonathon Rossi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
