Well I need to learn the A B C of IL generation, which surely would prove usefull, thanks for the invitation :)
On Nov 2, 7:18 pm, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patch? > > 2008/11/2 Gauthier Segay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > I'm not direct DynamicProxy, only using it remotely through MK > > interceptors and NH proxies. > > > However one thing I find lacking is the ability to proxy a type for a > > specific interface when the type has an explicit interface > > implementation (aka private members). > > > I don't know if it's a concern to anyone but me. > > > On Nov 2, 8:17 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I > >> think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would > >> use it. > >> Also +1 on calling new version v2.1 > > >> Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle > >> project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of > >> DynamicProxy2.dll > >> Krzysztof > > >> Jonathon Rossi pisze: > > >> > 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion. > > >> > So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2? > > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > >> > I'd vote for 2.1 > >> > 2.0 is very stable. > > >> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> > > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, > >> > should we call > >> > > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1? > > >> > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > >> > >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-) > > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> > >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what > >> > version > >> > >> > all > >> > >> > the different projects were at with RC3. > > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > >> > >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking > >> > into 2.1 or > >> > >> >> 2.0.1 > > >> > >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > >> > >> >> wrote: > >> > >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open > >> > issues from > >> > >> >> > donjon > >> > >> >> > for DynamicProxy: > >> > >> >> >http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy > > >> > >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues > >> > anymore, so we > >> > >> >> > need > >> > >> >> > to > >> > >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make > >> > changes to > >> > >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore. > > >> > >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to > >> > DynamicProxy 2.x > >> > >> >> > to > >> > >> >> > be > >> > >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0? > > >> > >> >> > -- > >> > >> >> > Jonathon Rossi > > >> > >> >> -- > >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> > >> >> hammett > >> > >> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > >> > >> > -- > >> > >> > Jonathon Rossi > > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> hammett > >> > >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > >> > > -- > >> > > Jonathon Rossi > > >> > -- > >> > Cheers, > >> > hammett > >> > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > >> > -- > >> > Jonathon Rossi > > -- > Cheers, > hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
